Adhesive Versus Spatial Anatomical Distortion Determines Energy Device Performance in Complex Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the type of anatomical distortion-spatial or adhesive-determines the relative performance of the energy device in complex total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 167 women who underwent complex TLH between 2018 and 2025 were included. Cases were classified according to intraoperatively confirmed distortion type as spatial (uterine enlargement), adhesive (previous cesarean delivery or endometriosis), or combined. INTERVENTIONS: TLH performed with conventional bipolar electrosurgery (CBP, n = 94) or LigaSure (LG, n = 73). Device selection was based on real-time availability. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome was operative time. Overall operative time (136 ± 18 vs. 140 ± 17 min, p = 0.761), hemoglobin change, and length of hospital stay were comparable between groups. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant interaction between device type and distortion subgroup (F (1,90) = 18.0, p < 0.001). In the spatial distortion subgroup, LG was associated with shorter operative time (90 ± 23 vs. 110 ± 17 min, p = 0.004). In the adhesive distortion subgroup, CBP outperformed LG (140 ± 23 vs. 155 ± 19 min, p = 0.003). Multivariable regression confirmed that the device-distortion interaction remained significant after adjustment for potential confounders (B = 18.9, p < 0.001). Bladder injury was more frequent in the LG group (8.2% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.031), exclusively in patients with prior cesarean delivery. All conversions to laparotomy occurred in the spatial distortion subgroup, with no significant difference between devices (4.3% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.961). CONCLUSION: Device efficiency in complex TLH is determined by the type of anatomical distortion. LG offers operative advantages when complexity is defined by uterine enlargement, whereas CBP electrosurgery is superior in the presence of adhesive disease. These findings support anatomy-driven device selection in complex TLH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.70427
Primary Topic
Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adhesive Versus Spatial Anatomical Distortion Determines Energy Device Performance in Complex Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Cenk Mustafa Güven, Dilek Uysal, Sebnem Ozgur
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
article

Adhesive Versus Spatial Anatomical Distortion Determines Energy Device Performance in Complex Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Cenk Mustafa Güven, Dilek Uysal, Sebnem Ozgur
article en

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the type of anatomical distortion-spatial or adhesive-determines the relative performance of the energy device in complex total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 167 women who underwent complex TLH between 2018 and 2025 were included. Cases were classified according to intraoperatively confirmed distortion type as spatial (uterine enlargement), adhesive (previous cesarean delivery or endometriosis), or combined. INTERVENTIONS: TLH performed with conventional bipolar electrosurgery (CBP, n = 94) or LigaSure (LG, n = 73). Device selection was based on real-time availability. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome was operative time. Overall operative time (136 ± 18 vs. 140 ± 17 min, p = 0.761), hemoglobin change, and length of hospital stay were comparable between groups. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant interaction between device type and distortion subgroup (F (1,90) = 18.0, p < 0.001). In the spatial distortion subgroup, LG was associated with shorter operative time (90 ± 23 vs. 110 ± 17 min, p = 0.004). In the adhesive distortion subgroup, CBP outperformed LG (140 ± 23 vs. 155 ± 19 min, p = 0.003). Multivariable regression confirmed that the device-distortion interaction remained significant after adjustment for potential confounders (B = 18.9, p < 0.001). Bladder injury was more frequent in the LG group (8.2% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.031), exclusively in patients with prior cesarean delivery. All conversions to laparotomy occurred in the spatial distortion subgroup, with no significant difference between devices (4.3% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.961). CONCLUSION: Device efficiency in complex TLH is determined by the type of anatomical distortion. LG offers operative advantages when complexity is defined by uterine enlargement, whereas CBP electrosurgery is superior in the presence of adhesive disease. These findings support anatomy-driven device selection in complex TLH.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology researchVol. 52(8)
Izmir University (TR), İzmir University of Economics (TR), Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.