Evaluating Human Perception Thresholds in Magnetic Stimulation Using Experimental Measurements and Modelling

ABSTRACT This preregistered study investigated whether induced electric fields alone could predict human perception thresholds in magnetic stimulation. Using a figure‐of‐eight magnetic coil placed on the forearm, perception thresholds were collected from 24 healthy participants using the method of adjustment in 12 stimulation conditions. Subject‐fitted, anatomically realistic forearm models were constructed from a set of 10 MRI‐based models. Induced electric fields were computed using the finite element method with probabilistic tissue conductivities and post‐processed using spatial averaging and percentiles. Linear mixed‐effects modelling showed that the perception threshold was 32.2 V/m (SD between subjects 5.2 V/m) for a damped sinusoidal magnetic pulse with 83 s phase duration. This threshold value was determined by spatial averaging over a cube with a side length of 2 mm and taking the 99th percentile of the electric field within the modelled forearms. However, the induced electric field did not fully explain the perception threshold (adjusted = 0.48; permutation testing, p 0.001). We also conducted a supplementary modelling study, retrospectively analysing previous literature results to allow for direct comparison with our findings. These results showed that simplified calculations of the threshold electric field, obtained by modelling the forearm as a uniform cylinder, need to be scaled by a factor of 1.4 to align with the 99th percentile electric field calculated with anatomically realistic models. Both our experimental results and the modelling provide data to inform the refinement of safety guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioelectromagnetics
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.70066
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Human Perception Thresholds in Magnetic Stimulation Using Experimental Measurements and Modelling

Otto Kangasmaa, Ilkka Laakso
Bioelectromagnetics
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
article

Evaluating Human Perception Thresholds in Magnetic Stimulation Using Experimental Measurements and Modelling

Otto Kangasmaa, Ilkka Laakso
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This preregistered study investigated whether induced electric fields alone could predict human perception thresholds in magnetic stimulation. Using a figure‐of‐eight magnetic coil placed on the forearm, perception thresholds were collected from 24 healthy participants using the method of adjustment in 12 stimulation conditions. Subject‐fitted, anatomically realistic forearm models were constructed from a set of 10 MRI‐based models. Induced electric fields were computed using the finite element method with probabilistic tissue conductivities and post‐processed using spatial averaging and percentiles. Linear mixed‐effects modelling showed that the perception threshold was 32.2 V/m (SD between subjects 5.2 V/m) for a damped sinusoidal magnetic pulse with 83 s phase duration. This threshold value was determined by spatial averaging over a cube with a side length of 2 mm and taking the 99th percentile of the electric field within the modelled forearms. However, the induced electric field did not fully explain the perception threshold (adjusted = 0.48; permutation testing, p 0.001). We also conducted a supplementary modelling study, retrospectively analysing previous literature results to allow for direct comparison with our findings. These results showed that simplified calculations of the threshold electric field, obtained by modelling the forearm as a uniform cylinder, need to be scaled by a factor of 1.4 to align with the 99th percentile electric field calculated with anatomically realistic models. Both our experimental results and the modelling provide data to inform the refinement of safety guidelines.

BioelectromagneticsVol. 47(6)
Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Human Perception Thresholds in Magnetic Stimulation Using Experimental Measurements and Modelling — Otto Kangasmaa, Ilkka Laakso · Bioelectromagnetics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS