Task Complexity Effects on Writing Processes and Correlations With Text Features

ABSTRACT Research on task complexity (TC) effects on second language (L2) text features is abundant and has contributed critical insights. Comparatively, less is known about how L2 writers respond cognitively to diverse TC conditions or about potential effects of such processing activity on the characteristics of the texts produced. To expand on previous research, this study examined (i) the effects of TC on L2 writers’ processing activity (operationalized as on‐line writing behaviors and macro writing processes) globally and across three time intervals; and (ii) any potential relationship of processing activity with text features (as measured by complexity, accuracy, and fluency indices). In an intra‐subject design study, 45 advanced L2 English users completed two argumentative writing tasks (in time‐compressed conditions) that varied in cognitive complexity, operationally defined as the provision of ±content support. Processing activity was captured with the keystroke logging software Inputlog, together with a self‐rating post‐task questionnaire. Results provided little evidence of TC effects on online writing behaviors but showed clearer differences in self‐reported macro‐writing processes, especially in the complex task condition. The analyses also indicated little evidence of TC effects on accuracy and syntactic complexity, together with selective associations between writing processes and text features across conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70317
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Task Complexity Effects on Writing Processes and Correlations With Text Features

Olena Vasylets, Judit Kormos, Bryan Koronkiewicz, Rosa María Manchón et al.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Task Complexity Effects on Writing Processes and Correlations With Text Features

Olena Vasylets, Judit Kormos, Bryan Koronkiewicz, Rosa María Manchón, Aitor Garcés‐Manzanera
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on task complexity (TC) effects on second language (L2) text features is abundant and has contributed critical insights. Comparatively, less is known about how L2 writers respond cognitively to diverse TC conditions or about potential effects of such processing activity on the characteristics of the texts produced. To expand on previous research, this study examined (i) the effects of TC on L2 writers’ processing activity (operationalized as on‐line writing behaviors and macro writing processes) globally and across three time intervals; and (ii) any potential relationship of processing activity with text features (as measured by complexity, accuracy, and fluency indices). In an intra‐subject design study, 45 advanced L2 English users completed two argumentative writing tasks (in time‐compressed conditions) that varied in cognitive complexity, operationally defined as the provision of ±content support. Processing activity was captured with the keystroke logging software Inputlog, together with a self‐rating post‐task questionnaire. Results provided little evidence of TC effects on online writing behaviors but showed clearer differences in self‐reported macro‐writing processes, especially in the complex task condition. The analyses also indicated little evidence of TC effects on accuracy and syntactic complexity, together with selective associations between writing processes and text features across conditions.

International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Modern Language Association (US), University of Ljubljana (SI), Lancaster University (GB), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Universidad de Murcia (ES)
European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.