Structure–Performance Relationships of Commercial Cathode Gas Diffusion Layers in High‐Temperature PEM Fuel Cells

ABSTRACT The influence of cathode gas diffusion layer (GDL) architecture on the performance of high‐temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT‐PEMFCs) remains insufficiently understood, particularly for commercially available materials with different substrate and microporous layer (MPL) designs. In this study, six commercial cathode GDLs were systematically compared using polarization analysis, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, contact‐angle measurement, scanning electron microscopy, mercury intrusion porosimetry, x‐ray computed tomography, and COMSOL simulation. SGL 36BB and 22BB showed the best performance under both H 2 /Air and H 2 /O 2, reaching maximum power densities of 0.445 ± 0.005 and 0.426 ± 0.011 W/cm 2 , whereas H23C2 performed worst at 0.302 ± 0.008 W/cm 2 . The electrochemical and structural results indicate that backing‐layer hydrophobic treatment and MPL architecture play a critical role in phosphoric acid management and transport losses, whereas porosity alone does not fully explain the observed performance ranking. The simulation reproduced the overall experimental trend for most GDLs, while the deviation observed for H23C2 suggests that acid‐related effects should be more explicitly considered in future modeling of HT‐PEMFC GDLs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel Cells
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.70137
Primary Topic
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structure–Performance Relationships of Commercial Cathode Gas Diffusion Layers in High‐Temperature PEM Fuel Cells

Arun Torris, Harshal Agarwal, Carsten Cremers, Jens Tübke et al.
Fuel Cells
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
article

Structure–Performance Relationships of Commercial Cathode Gas Diffusion Layers in High‐Temperature PEM Fuel Cells

Arun Torris, Harshal Agarwal, Carsten Cremers, Jens Tübke, Suresha Ranganath, Ahyeon Won
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The influence of cathode gas diffusion layer (GDL) architecture on the performance of high‐temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT‐PEMFCs) remains insufficiently understood, particularly for commercially available materials with different substrate and microporous layer (MPL) designs. In this study, six commercial cathode GDLs were systematically compared using polarization analysis, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, contact‐angle measurement, scanning electron microscopy, mercury intrusion porosimetry, x‐ray computed tomography, and COMSOL simulation. SGL 36BB and 22BB showed the best performance under both H 2 /Air and H 2 /O 2, reaching maximum power densities of 0.445 ± 0.005 and 0.426 ± 0.011 W/cm 2 , whereas H23C2 performed worst at 0.302 ± 0.008 W/cm 2 . The electrochemical and structural results indicate that backing‐layer hydrophobic treatment and MPL architecture play a critical role in phosphoric acid management and transport losses, whereas porosity alone does not fully explain the observed performance ranking. The simulation reproduced the overall experimental trend for most GDLs, while the deviation observed for H23C2 suggests that acid‐related effects should be more explicitly considered in future modeling of HT‐PEMFC GDLs.

Fuel CellsVol. 26(4)
Central Electrochemical Research Institute (IN), National Chemical Laboratory (IN), Fraunhofer Institute for Chemical Technology (DE)
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, Central ElectroChemical Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.