Rough handling detection and crying-based rejective feedback for a baby-like robot: system design and evaluations by older adult users and caregivers

Caregiving-style physical interaction with baby-like robots can support the engagement of older adults with cognitive impairment in care settings. However, some users handle such robots roughly, which can disrupt the interaction. Without rejective feedback from the robot, the boundary between acceptable and unacceptable handling can remain ambiguous to both users and caregivers; moreover, context-inappropriate feedback can confuse users and hinder caregiver decisions about intervention. We first constructed a behavior recognition model to detect rough handling, defined as tossing and dropping, using onboard inertial sensors. The model was trained on data from 24 older adults and achieves a mean F1-score of 0.808. We then integrated this detection model into a robot system that outputs crying as rejective feedback. We evaluated our approach against non-rejective responses from two stakeholder perspectives. In a lab study with 24 older adults, crying made the perceived robot affect more unpleasant; overall impression and guilt did not differ. In a third-party video study with 199 caregivers, crying increased perceived ease of use, usefulness, and intention to use. Our findings suggest that negative vocal feedback communicates robot discomfort to older adult users and helps caregivers interpret incidents and choose an appropriate response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Robotics
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2026.2707054
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rough handling detection and crying-based rejective feedback for a baby-like robot: system design and evaluations by older adult users and caregivers

Hidenobu Sumioka, Masahiro Shiomi, Takamasa Iio, Mamiko Sakata et al.
Advanced Robotics
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Rough handling detection and crying-based rejective feedback for a baby-like robot: system design and evaluations by older adult users and caregivers

Hidenobu Sumioka, Masahiro Shiomi, Takamasa Iio, Mamiko Sakata, Hayata Goto
article en

Abstract

Caregiving-style physical interaction with baby-like robots can support the engagement of older adults with cognitive impairment in care settings. However, some users handle such robots roughly, which can disrupt the interaction. Without rejective feedback from the robot, the boundary between acceptable and unacceptable handling can remain ambiguous to both users and caregivers; moreover, context-inappropriate feedback can confuse users and hinder caregiver decisions about intervention. We first constructed a behavior recognition model to detect rough handling, defined as tossing and dropping, using onboard inertial sensors. The model was trained on data from 24 older adults and achieves a mean F1-score of 0.808. We then integrated this detection model into a robot system that outputs crying as rejective feedback. We evaluated our approach against non-rejective responses from two stakeholder perspectives. In a lab study with 24 older adults, crying made the perceived robot affect more unpleasant; overall impression and guilt did not differ. In a third-party video study with 199 caregivers, crying increased perceived ease of use, usefulness, and intention to use. Our findings suggest that negative vocal feedback communicates robot discomfort to older adult users and helps caregivers interpret incidents and choose an appropriate response.

Advanced Robotics
Doshisha University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (JP)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.