L2 Chinese Grammatical Acquisition and Processing: A Substantive and Methodological Review

ABSTRACT This study presents a systematic review of 92 empirical studies on Chinese as a second language (CSL) in grammatical processing and development, synthesizing their substantive foci and methodological characteristics. The results reveal consistent scholarly attention to cross‐linguistic topics, with less focus on features that are distinctively salient in Chinese. Methodologically, studies most commonly relied on quantitative approaches and judgment tasks, while the use of online measures emerged only after 2014. We also identified several persistent challenges, including an overreliance on English‐speaking university students as participants, inconsistent proficiency assessment practices across studies, and limitations in transparent data reporting. In light of these limitations, we call for the adoption of a broader range of methodological tools, the inclusion of more diverse participants, varied research designs, and statistical techniques to enhance the rigor of CSL research and its contribution to the broader SLA field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70316
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

L2 Chinese Grammatical Acquisition and Processing: A Substantive and Methodological Review

Jiani He, Yi-Xiang Wang, Yi Xu, Shaohua Fang
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

L2 Chinese Grammatical Acquisition and Processing: A Substantive and Methodological Review

Jiani He, Yi-Xiang Wang, Yi Xu, Shaohua Fang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study presents a systematic review of 92 empirical studies on Chinese as a second language (CSL) in grammatical processing and development, synthesizing their substantive foci and methodological characteristics. The results reveal consistent scholarly attention to cross‐linguistic topics, with less focus on features that are distinctively salient in Chinese. Methodologically, studies most commonly relied on quantitative approaches and judgment tasks, while the use of online measures emerged only after 2014. We also identified several persistent challenges, including an overreliance on English‐speaking university students as participants, inconsistent proficiency assessment practices across studies, and limitations in transparent data reporting. In light of these limitations, we call for the adoption of a broader range of methodological tools, the inclusion of more diverse participants, varied research designs, and statistical techniques to enhance the rigor of CSL research and its contribution to the broader SLA field.

International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Montclair State University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Yunnan University (CN), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Nanjing University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.