Quantum Compilation of Conservative Matrix Field Products

We systematically compare seven quantum gate constructions for implementing products of rank-2 conservative matrix field (CMF) transition matrices on a single system qubit. The constructions span exact block encodings (Halmos dilation, sequential local encodings, Pauli LCU), approximate unitary surrogates (polar factor, Hermitian-dilation evolution), and CMF- specific compilation strategies (flatness-aware path selection, telescoping gauge optimization). Using a deterministic benchmark with three stiffness regimes and a Monte Carlo stress test over 200 random flat rank-2 LDU fields, we evaluate conditional state fidelity, postselection success probability, transpiled circuit depth, and noisy performance under depolarizing error. All exact constructions achieve ideal conditional fidelity 1 to numerical precision. The key trade-off is success probability: for the stiff regime (5, 4), the normalization product drops from 13.55 on the lexicographic path to 3.15 after path and gauge optimization—a 18.5× improvement in postselection success. We then validate on three authentic CMF families (e, ζ(3), π) and a non-flat 2F1 control across 130 trajectories, formulate the gauge problem as constrained gauge optimization, derive the exact postselected Hermitian-dilation operator, and present HD as a true Pareto family in the success–fidelity trade-off.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21627932
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Quantum Compilation of Conservative Matrix Field Products

David Vesterlund
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
preprint

Quantum Compilation of Conservative Matrix Field Products

David Vesterlund
preprint en

Abstract

We systematically compare seven quantum gate constructions for implementing products of rank-2 conservative matrix field (CMF) transition matrices on a single system qubit. The constructions span exact block encodings (Halmos dilation, sequential local encodings, Pauli LCU), approximate unitary surrogates (polar factor, Hermitian-dilation evolution), and CMF- specific compilation strategies (flatness-aware path selection, telescoping gauge optimization). Using a deterministic benchmark with three stiffness regimes and a Monte Carlo stress test over 200 random flat rank-2 LDU fields, we evaluate conditional state fidelity, postselection success probability, transpiled circuit depth, and noisy performance under depolarizing error. All exact constructions achieve ideal conditional fidelity 1 to numerical precision. The key trade-off is success probability: for the stiff regime (5, 4), the normalization product drops from 13.55 on the lexicographic path to 3.15 after path and gauge optimization—a 18.5× improvement in postselection success. We then validate on three authentic CMF families (e, ζ(3), π) and a non-flat 2F1 control across 130 trajectories, formulate the gauge problem as constrained gauge optimization, derive the exact postselected Hermitian-dilation operator, and present HD as a true Pareto family in the success–fidelity trade-off.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantum Compilation of Conservative Matrix Field Products — David Vesterlund · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS