Anticholinergic Burden in Individuals with Down Syndrome: An Examination of Risk and Clinical Implications

Background/objective: Down syndrome (DS) is characterized by premature aging, with comorbidities observed in the older population without DS, a high prevalence of multimorbidity and cognitive decline. The use of multiple medications further increases clinical complexity. The objective of this paper is to evaluate anticholinergic use and the anticholinergic burden (ACB) in a sample of persons with DS. Methods: cross-sectional retrospective study involving community-dwelling persons with DS, afferent to the DS clinics of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” (Rome, Italy). Individuals were assessed through a standardized clinical protocol. ACB was evaluated according to the anticholinergic cognitive burden scale, with a score ≥ 3 indicating high risk of anticholinergic side effects. Results: 337 individuals were taking ≥ 1 chronic medication, mean age was 37.7 (±14.6), 158 (43.8%) were females. 143 (39.6%) individuals took ≥ 1 medication with known anticholinergic burden, 51 (14.1%) individuals showed high risk ACB score. High risk ACB score prevalence increased with age (<18 years n = 0, 0%; 18–39 years n = 14, 8.2%; 40+ years n = 37, 22.3% p < 0.001). Polypharmacy was more prevalent among individuals with high ACB score (n = 20, 39.2% vs. n = 23, 7.4%, p < 0.001). The most prevalent drugs in individuals with high risk ACB score were antipsychotics (n = 34, 66.6% vs. n = 17, 33.3%, p < 0.001). The most prevalent comorbid condition was psychosis (n = 34, 66.6% vs. n = 16, 33.3%, p < 0.001). Discussion: individuals with DS show a high prevalence of anticholinergic drug use, increasing with age and associated with polypharmacy and psychiatric conditions. These medications are directly addressing the underlying psychiatric or neurological conditions in DS, rather than causing them. Nevertheless, these medications are often essential for managing psychiatric disorders, simultaneously increasing ACB, posing a risk of exacerbating pre-existing vulnerabilities (e.g., cognitive decline), which warrants the need for a more personalized strategy. Conclusions: A thorough assessment of drug history is mandatory in the DS population, to apply deprescribing, pharmacological switches, non-pharmacological approaches, to lower or even prevent high ACB, promoting overall a personalized and tailored approach to this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16080398
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anticholinergic Burden in Individuals with Down Syndrome: An Examination of Risk and Clinical Implications

Antonella Di Paola, Graziano Onder, Angelo Carfì, Laura Franza et al.
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Anticholinergic Burden in Individuals with Down Syndrome: An Examination of Risk and Clinical Implications

Antonella Di Paola, Graziano Onder, Angelo Carfì, Laura Franza, Rosa Liperoti, Emanuele Rocco Villani, Francesca Maria Secciani
article en

Abstract

Background/objective: Down syndrome (DS) is characterized by premature aging, with comorbidities observed in the older population without DS, a high prevalence of multimorbidity and cognitive decline. The use of multiple medications further increases clinical complexity. The objective of this paper is to evaluate anticholinergic use and the anticholinergic burden (ACB) in a sample of persons with DS. Methods: cross-sectional retrospective study involving community-dwelling persons with DS, afferent to the DS clinics of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” (Rome, Italy). Individuals were assessed through a standardized clinical protocol. ACB was evaluated according to the anticholinergic cognitive burden scale, with a score ≥ 3 indicating high risk of anticholinergic side effects. Results: 337 individuals were taking ≥ 1 chronic medication, mean age was 37.7 (±14.6), 158 (43.8%) were females. 143 (39.6%) individuals took ≥ 1 medication with known anticholinergic burden, 51 (14.1%) individuals showed high risk ACB score. High risk ACB score prevalence increased with age (<18 years n = 0, 0%; 18–39 years n = 14, 8.2%; 40+ years n = 37, 22.3% p < 0.001). Polypharmacy was more prevalent among individuals with high ACB score (n = 20, 39.2% vs. n = 23, 7.4%, p < 0.001). The most prevalent drugs in individuals with high risk ACB score were antipsychotics (n = 34, 66.6% vs. n = 17, 33.3%, p < 0.001). The most prevalent comorbid condition was psychosis (n = 34, 66.6% vs. n = 16, 33.3%, p < 0.001). Discussion: individuals with DS show a high prevalence of anticholinergic drug use, increasing with age and associated with polypharmacy and psychiatric conditions. These medications are directly addressing the underlying psychiatric or neurological conditions in DS, rather than causing them. Nevertheless, these medications are often essential for managing psychiatric disorders, simultaneously increasing ACB, posing a risk of exacerbating pre-existing vulnerabilities (e.g., cognitive decline), which warrants the need for a more personalized strategy. Conclusions: A thorough assessment of drug history is mandatory in the DS population, to apply deprescribing, pharmacological switches, non-pharmacological approaches, to lower or even prevent high ACB, promoting overall a personalized and tailored approach to this population.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 16(8)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT), Agenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.