The Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides, and Polyols Diet Is Effective in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A Single Center Tertiary Care Clinical Practice Evaluation

Background/Aims: The low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet is a well-researched treatment for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), but its value for constipation-predominant IBS (IBS-C) is uncertain.Clinicians may hesitate to recommend it for IBS-C, fearing it could worsen constipation or offer little relief.This study aims to assess the diet's effectiveness across all IBS subtypes, specifically investigating its impact on stool patterns in IBS-C and the correlation with symptom relief.Methods: This prospective service evaluation involved 294 IBS patients (84% female, mean age 44.6) attending dietitian-led group sessions on FODMAP restriction (baseline) and reintroduction (follow-up).The primary outcome was "satisfactory relief of gut symptoms" via the global symptom question; secondary outcomes included changes in stool consistency, IBS subtype, and gastrointestinal symptoms.Results: At baseline, 23.8% (70/294) had IBS-C and 35.7% IBS-D (105/294).All subtypes except IBS-M showed significant symptom relief at follow-up (P < 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between IBS-C (50.7%, 35/69) and IBS-D (44.8%, 47/105) (P = 0.158).After FODMAP restriction, 50.7% (35/69) IBS-C remained IBS-C, while 44.9% (31/69) shifted to unclassified IBS (IBS-U).Those who shifted (IBS-C to IBS-U) reported greater relief (74.2%, 23/31 vs 45.7% 16/35, P = 0.019) and reduced pain (P = 0.006), unlike those who remained IBS-C (P = 0.180).Conclusions: IBS-C and IBS-D showed similar symptom relief after FODMAP restriction.Notably, 44.9% of IBS-C patients shifted to normal stool consistency (IBS-U), with greater symptom relief and reduced pain.FODMAP restriction does not necessarily exacerbate constipation in IBS-C and remains a viable treatment option in real world clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm25126
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides, and Polyols Diet Is Effective in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A Single Center Tertiary Care Clinical Practice Evaluation

Lee Martin, Konstantinos C. Fragkos
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

The Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides, and Polyols Diet Is Effective in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A Single Center Tertiary Care Clinical Practice Evaluation

Lee Martin, Konstantinos C. Fragkos
article en

Abstract

Background/Aims: The low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet is a well-researched treatment for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), but its value for constipation-predominant IBS (IBS-C) is uncertain.Clinicians may hesitate to recommend it for IBS-C, fearing it could worsen constipation or offer little relief.This study aims to assess the diet's effectiveness across all IBS subtypes, specifically investigating its impact on stool patterns in IBS-C and the correlation with symptom relief.Methods: This prospective service evaluation involved 294 IBS patients (84% female, mean age 44.6) attending dietitian-led group sessions on FODMAP restriction (baseline) and reintroduction (follow-up).The primary outcome was "satisfactory relief of gut symptoms" via the global symptom question; secondary outcomes included changes in stool consistency, IBS subtype, and gastrointestinal symptoms.Results: At baseline, 23.8% (70/294) had IBS-C and 35.7% IBS-D (105/294).All subtypes except IBS-M showed significant symptom relief at follow-up (P < 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between IBS-C (50.7%, 35/69) and IBS-D (44.8%, 47/105) (P = 0.158).After FODMAP restriction, 50.7% (35/69) IBS-C remained IBS-C, while 44.9% (31/69) shifted to unclassified IBS (IBS-U).Those who shifted (IBS-C to IBS-U) reported greater relief (74.2%, 23/31 vs 45.7% 16/35, P = 0.019) and reduced pain (P = 0.006), unlike those who remained IBS-C (P = 0.180).Conclusions: IBS-C and IBS-D showed similar symptom relief after FODMAP restriction.Notably, 44.9% of IBS-C patients shifted to normal stool consistency (IBS-U), with greater symptom relief and reduced pain.FODMAP restriction does not necessarily exacerbate constipation in IBS-C and remains a viable treatment option in real world clinical practice.

Journal of Neurogastroenterology and MotilityVol. 32(3)
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.