Comparative evaluation of commercial gradient diffusion and disk diffusion tests for aztreonam–avibactam susceptibility testing

Aztreonam-avibactam (AZA) is a recently approved agent active against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. However, independent evaluations of commercially available antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) products remain limited. We evaluated 56 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates using four newly available AZA AST products, including two gradient diffusion tests (bioMérieux Etest; Liofilchem MIC Test Strip) and two disk diffusion tests (Hardy, Liofilchem) across three Mueller-Hinton agar manufacturers at two independent clinical laboratories. A diverse isolate collection enriched for nonsusceptible and breakpoint-adjacent MICs was used to rigorously assess categorical agreement (CA). Broth microdilution (BMD) was used as the reference method. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement, error rates, and reproducibility were analyzed. All four commercial AST products demonstrated acceptable analytical performance compared with reference BMD. Gradient diffusion demonstrated high EA (bioMérieux 92.6%, Liofilchem 89.6%), whereas CA ranged from 81.5% to 89.3% across all four products. Minor errors accounted for all categorical discrepancies and occurred almost exclusively among breakpoint-adjacent isolates. Medium-related variability was modest, and quality control (QC) performance was generally high, with strong within-site precision and consistent performance across laboratories. This study provides the first comprehensive head-to-head comparison of commercial AZA susceptibility testing products and supports their implementation in clinical microbiology laboratories.IMPORTANCEAztreonam-avibactam is an important new treatment option for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, particularly metallo-β-lactamase-producing organisms, but its clinical use requires reliable susceptibility testing. We provide the first head-to-head evaluation of four newly available commercial gradient and disk diffusion products across two independent laboratories and three Mueller-Hinton agar manufacturers. By using a diverse isolate collection enriched for MICs near clinical breakpoints, we also subjected these products to a stringent assessment of categorical agreement. Gradient diffusion demonstrated high essential agreement, and no major or very major errors remained after repeat and discrepancy testing with any product. These findings provide timely, practical evidence to guide clinical laboratories implementing aztreonam-avibactam susceptibility testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01124-26
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of commercial gradient diffusion and disk diffusion tests for aztreonam–avibactam susceptibility testing

Gregory J. Berry, Lars F. Westblade, Supram Hosuru Subramanya, Daniel A. Green et al.
7 links
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

Comparative evaluation of commercial gradient diffusion and disk diffusion tests for aztreonam–avibactam susceptibility testing

Gregory J. Berry, Lars F. Westblade, Supram Hosuru Subramanya, Daniel A. Green, Jennifer Pfeiffer, Rinki Kumar
article en

Abstract

Aztreonam-avibactam (AZA) is a recently approved agent active against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. However, independent evaluations of commercially available antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) products remain limited. We evaluated 56 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates using four newly available AZA AST products, including two gradient diffusion tests (bioMérieux Etest; Liofilchem MIC Test Strip) and two disk diffusion tests (Hardy, Liofilchem) across three Mueller-Hinton agar manufacturers at two independent clinical laboratories. A diverse isolate collection enriched for nonsusceptible and breakpoint-adjacent MICs was used to rigorously assess categorical agreement (CA). Broth microdilution (BMD) was used as the reference method. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement, error rates, and reproducibility were analyzed. All four commercial AST products demonstrated acceptable analytical performance compared with reference BMD. Gradient diffusion demonstrated high EA (bioMérieux 92.6%, Liofilchem 89.6%), whereas CA ranged from 81.5% to 89.3% across all four products. Minor errors accounted for all categorical discrepancies and occurred almost exclusively among breakpoint-adjacent isolates. Medium-related variability was modest, and quality control (QC) performance was generally high, with strong within-site precision and consistent performance across laboratories. This study provides the first comprehensive head-to-head comparison of commercial AZA susceptibility testing products and supports their implementation in clinical microbiology laboratories.IMPORTANCEAztreonam-avibactam is an important new treatment option for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, particularly metallo-β-lactamase-producing organisms, but its clinical use requires reliable susceptibility testing. We provide the first head-to-head evaluation of four newly available commercial gradient and disk diffusion products across two independent laboratories and three Mueller-Hinton agar manufacturers. By using a diverse isolate collection enriched for MICs near clinical breakpoints, we also subjected these products to a stringent assessment of categorical agreement. Gradient diffusion demonstrated high essential agreement, and no major or very major errors remained after repeat and discrepancy testing with any product. These findings provide timely, practical evidence to guide clinical laboratories implementing aztreonam-avibactam susceptibility testing.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon