Predictive Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score From Nongated Chest CT Scans Compared With Gated Scans and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events

BACKGROUND: Data on the prognostic value of incidental coronary artery calcium (CAC) from nongated chest computed tomography scans are limited. Using paired computed tomography scans from the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) exam 5, we evaluated the relationship between nongated CAC, gated CAC, and future cardiovascular events. METHODS: Between April 2010 and December 2011, a total of 2601 participants underwent same-day gated and nongated chest computed tomography scans. After excluding 106 with previous coronary heart disease or cardiovascular disease and 23 for missing covariates, 2472 participants formed the study population. Gated and nongated scans were interpreted at a core laboratory, blinded to acquisition methodology. Cox regression examined associations between CAC (gated and nongated) and incident coronary heart disease/cardiovascular disease events. Correlation was assessed with Pearson coefficients, model performance with receiver operating characteristic curves and C-statistic, and overall accuracy with Brier scores. RESULTS: Among the 2472 participants, 53% were female, 38% white, 13% Chinese, 26% Black, and 23% Hispanic/Latino. Compared with participants with zero CAC, those with moderate (101–299) and severe (≥300) nongated CAC had higher coronary heart disease risk (hazard ratio, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.14–6.27]; hazard ratio, 5.22 [95% CI, 2.37–11.5]) and cardiovascular disease risk (hazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.32–4.04]; hazard ratio, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.68–4.96]). Gated and nongated log-standardized CAC highly correlated ( r =0.961; P <0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, C-statistic, and Brier scores were statistically similar for gated and nongated CAC. CONCLUSIONS: Nongated CAC predicts cardiovascular events with performance comparable to gated CAC. Given the large number of nongated scans performed annually, incorporating their quantification into clinical practice offers a scalable approach to personalized preventive care. Our findings are particularly relevant in light of the recent 2026 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association dyslipidemia guidelines, which endorse the use of incidental CAC from nongated computed tomography scans for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk stratification and guiding lipid-lowering therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.125.078431
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score From Nongated Chest CT Scans Compared With Gated Scans and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events

Sanjay Manubolu, Robyn L. McClelland, Michael Joseph Blaha, Matthew Allison et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
7.96
article

Predictive Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score From Nongated Chest CT Scans Compared With Gated Scans and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events

Sanjay Manubolu, Robyn L. McClelland, Michael Joseph Blaha, Matthew Allison, Ignacio Inglessis‐Azuaje, Dhiran Verghese, Dee Dee Wang, Robert J. Cubeddu, April Kinninger, Jairo Aldana-Bitar, Divya Abraham, Akl C. Fahed, Lyndia Brumback, Matthew Jay Budoff, Raul Trujillo, Douglas Drachman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on the prognostic value of incidental coronary artery calcium (CAC) from nongated chest computed tomography scans are limited. Using paired computed tomography scans from the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) exam 5, we evaluated the relationship between nongated CAC, gated CAC, and future cardiovascular events. METHODS: Between April 2010 and December 2011, a total of 2601 participants underwent same-day gated and nongated chest computed tomography scans. After excluding 106 with previous coronary heart disease or cardiovascular disease and 23 for missing covariates, 2472 participants formed the study population. Gated and nongated scans were interpreted at a core laboratory, blinded to acquisition methodology. Cox regression examined associations between CAC (gated and nongated) and incident coronary heart disease/cardiovascular disease events. Correlation was assessed with Pearson coefficients, model performance with receiver operating characteristic curves and C-statistic, and overall accuracy with Brier scores. RESULTS: Among the 2472 participants, 53% were female, 38% white, 13% Chinese, 26% Black, and 23% Hispanic/Latino. Compared with participants with zero CAC, those with moderate (101–299) and severe (≥300) nongated CAC had higher coronary heart disease risk (hazard ratio, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.14–6.27]; hazard ratio, 5.22 [95% CI, 2.37–11.5]) and cardiovascular disease risk (hazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.32–4.04]; hazard ratio, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.68–4.96]). Gated and nongated log-standardized CAC highly correlated ( r =0.961; P <0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, C-statistic, and Brier scores were statistically similar for gated and nongated CAC. CONCLUSIONS: Nongated CAC predicts cardiovascular events with performance comparable to gated CAC. Given the large number of nongated scans performed annually, incorporating their quantification into clinical practice offers a scalable approach to personalized preventive care. Our findings are particularly relevant in light of the recent 2026 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association dyslipidemia guidelines, which endorse the use of incidental CAC from nongated computed tomography scans for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk stratification and guiding lipid-lowering therapy.

CirculationVol. 154(4)
Harvard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Bridgeport (US), University of Washington (US), Naples Community Hospital Healthcare System (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), UCLA Medical Center (US), University of California San Diego (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
7.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.