Identifying the Predominant Active Copper Species in Methanol Oxidative Carbonylation: A Case for Cu+ or Cu0

A serial of Cu2O/activated carbon (AC) and Cu0/AC catalysts were prepared in situ and evaluated in methanol oxidative carbonylation to clarify the mechanistic differences between Cu2O and Cu0 active species. It was found that both species are catalytically active, but Cu2O exhibits significantly higher efficiency than Cu0. Feeding sequence studies reveal that, on Cu2O, co-adsorbed CH3O and CO react via the L–H mechanism to form CH3OCO intermediates, a favorable pathway for DMC formation; on Cu0, however, CH3OCO forms via the E–R mechanism between adsorbed CH3O and gaseous CO, which is less efficient. Moreover, deactivation is mainly due to copper oxidation, which is sequence-dependent but valence-independent. This study highlights Cu2O as the superior active center and offers fundamental understanding of copper valence-dependent catalysis in methanol oxidative carbonylation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catalysts
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16080677
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying the Predominant Active Copper Species in Methanol Oxidative Carbonylation: A Case for Cu+ or Cu0

Dezhi Shi, Yanfeng Xue, Xiaoqing Gao, Hongyan Zheng et al.
Catalysts
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
article

Identifying the Predominant Active Copper Species in Methanol Oxidative Carbonylation: A Case for Cu+ or Cu0

Dezhi Shi, Yanfeng Xue, Xiaoqing Gao, Hongyan Zheng, Yi-Xiang Wang, Yulan Niu, Xiaojing Cui, Xinmei Gao
article en

Abstract

A serial of Cu2O/activated carbon (AC) and Cu0/AC catalysts were prepared in situ and evaluated in methanol oxidative carbonylation to clarify the mechanistic differences between Cu2O and Cu0 active species. It was found that both species are catalytically active, but Cu2O exhibits significantly higher efficiency than Cu0. Feeding sequence studies reveal that, on Cu2O, co-adsorbed CH3O and CO react via the L–H mechanism to form CH3OCO intermediates, a favorable pathway for DMC formation; on Cu0, however, CH3OCO forms via the E–R mechanism between adsorbed CH3O and gaseous CO, which is less efficient. Moreover, deactivation is mainly due to copper oxidation, which is sequence-dependent but valence-independent. This study highlights Cu2O as the superior active center and offers fundamental understanding of copper valence-dependent catalysis in methanol oxidative carbonylation.

CatalystsVol. 16(8)
Taiyuan Institute of Technology (CN), Wuxi Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identifying the Predominant Active Copper Species in Methanol Oxidative Carbonylation: A Case for Cu+ or Cu0 — Dezhi Shi, Yanfeng Xue, et al. · Catalysts (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS