Navigating the hybrid media landscape? Danish green NGOs’ use of digital platforms for internal and external communication

Operating within a hybrid media environment, NGOs face ongoing digital platform expansions and shifting user preferences, demanding continual adaptation of communication strategies. While research largely overlooks internal communication practices, we examine how 20 Danish green NGOs navigate multiple platforms for both external and internal communication. Although advocacy and operational NGOs share similar platform preferences, they manage multi-platform presence very differently. External communication platform choices are primarily audience-driven, whereas internally, NGOs adopt a bricolage of tools approach. Although other channels exist, Facebook remains central across both domains despite tensions with its capitalist logics and NGO dependence, creating a reliance paradox.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Technology & Politics
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2026.2706789
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the hybrid media landscape? Danish green NGOs’ use of digital platforms for internal and external communication

Markus Löchtefeld, Malayna Raftopoulos, Anita Nissen, Andreas Beyer Gregersen
Journal of Information Technology & Politics
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Navigating the hybrid media landscape? Danish green NGOs’ use of digital platforms for internal and external communication

Markus Löchtefeld, Malayna Raftopoulos, Anita Nissen, Andreas Beyer Gregersen
article en

Abstract

Operating within a hybrid media environment, NGOs face ongoing digital platform expansions and shifting user preferences, demanding continual adaptation of communication strategies. While research largely overlooks internal communication practices, we examine how 20 Danish green NGOs navigate multiple platforms for both external and internal communication. Although advocacy and operational NGOs share similar platform preferences, they manage multi-platform presence very differently. External communication platform choices are primarily audience-driven, whereas internally, NGOs adopt a bricolage of tools approach. Although other channels exist, Facebook remains central across both domains despite tensions with its capitalist logics and NGO dependence, creating a reliance paradox.

Journal of Information Technology & Politics
Aalborg University (DK)
Aalborg Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating the hybrid media landscape? Danish green NGOs’ use of digital platforms for internal and external communication — Markus Löchtefeld, Malayna Raftopoulos, et al. · Journal of Information Technology & Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS