An “Avian” Strategy to Improve Biology Students’ Metacognition

Science coursework has a reputation for focusing on the acquisition of new knowledge without sufficiently training students to apply that knowledge in order to solve important problems of the 21st century. For example, students may take exams with questions that primarily address the lowest tiers of the pyramid known as “Bloom’s Taxonomy,” namely “Remember” and “Understand.” Without much experience at the higher tiers, students do not gain confidence in tasks such as critiquing others’ work (“Evaluate”) or designing their own experiments (“Create”), both of which are important in preparing to become professional scientists. To help address this potential gap in their training, a new initiative was developed for biology students to more explicitly practice the types of thinking associated with each tier of the pyramid. The practice occurs consistently throughout the semester and in an engaging context, namely, the biology of birds. Over the course of the semester, students complete a series of strategically designed worksheets that accompany the reading of primary articles related to course material but always in the context of birds. Anonymous surveys reveal a significant improvement in students’ comfort with tasks that require the types of thinking that will allow them to make contributions to the scientific community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The journal of college science teaching
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231x.2026.2693934
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An “Avian” Strategy to Improve Biology Students’ Metacognition

Laura Romanó
The journal of college science teaching
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

An “Avian” Strategy to Improve Biology Students’ Metacognition

Laura Romanó
article en

Abstract

Science coursework has a reputation for focusing on the acquisition of new knowledge without sufficiently training students to apply that knowledge in order to solve important problems of the 21st century. For example, students may take exams with questions that primarily address the lowest tiers of the pyramid known as “Bloom’s Taxonomy,” namely “Remember” and “Understand.” Without much experience at the higher tiers, students do not gain confidence in tasks such as critiquing others’ work (“Evaluate”) or designing their own experiments (“Create”), both of which are important in preparing to become professional scientists. To help address this potential gap in their training, a new initiative was developed for biology students to more explicitly practice the types of thinking associated with each tier of the pyramid. The practice occurs consistently throughout the semester and in an engaging context, namely, the biology of birds. Over the course of the semester, students complete a series of strategically designed worksheets that accompany the reading of primary articles related to course material but always in the context of birds. Anonymous surveys reveal a significant improvement in students’ comfort with tasks that require the types of thinking that will allow them to make contributions to the scientific community.

The journal of college science teaching
Denison University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.