Self-Reported Environmental Goal Achievement, Goal Importance, and Monitoring Practices Among EU EMAS-Registered Organizations: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey

This study examines how EU EMAS-registered organizations prioritize environmental goals, monitor environmental indicators, and report achievement outcomes. Based on a Computer-Assisted Web Interview survey of 297 organizations from different sectors and countries, the analysis focuses on self-reported goal achievement rather than objectively verified environmental performance. Nearly all surveyed organizations reported having set environmental goals (98.7%), with energy reduction and regulatory compliance among the most frequently prioritized areas. In this sample, higher self-reported goal achievement was correlated with higher perceived importance of environmental goals. The association between the perceived importance of monitoring and self-reported achievement was less consistent and varied by environmental aspect. The findings suggest that EMAS organizations use structured goal-setting and monitoring practices, but reported achievement levels vary by sector, country, and organizational priorities. Given the cross-sectional and self-reported nature of the data, the results should be interpreted as associative rather than causal. No claims of directional or causal effects are made.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18157644
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Reported Environmental Goal Achievement, Goal Importance, and Monitoring Practices Among EU EMAS-Registered Organizations: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey

Beata Paliwoda, Silvia Fiore, Stefano Castelluccio, Claudio Comoglio et al.
Sustainability
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Self-Reported Environmental Goal Achievement, Goal Importance, and Monitoring Practices Among EU EMAS-Registered Organizations: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey

Beata Paliwoda, Silvia Fiore, Stefano Castelluccio, Claudio Comoglio, Alina Matuszak-Flejszman
article en

Abstract

This study examines how EU EMAS-registered organizations prioritize environmental goals, monitor environmental indicators, and report achievement outcomes. Based on a Computer-Assisted Web Interview survey of 297 organizations from different sectors and countries, the analysis focuses on self-reported goal achievement rather than objectively verified environmental performance. Nearly all surveyed organizations reported having set environmental goals (98.7%), with energy reduction and regulatory compliance among the most frequently prioritized areas. In this sample, higher self-reported goal achievement was correlated with higher perceived importance of environmental goals. The association between the perceived importance of monitoring and self-reported achievement was less consistent and varied by environmental aspect. The findings suggest that EMAS organizations use structured goal-setting and monitoring practices, but reported achievement levels vary by sector, country, and organizational priorities. Given the cross-sectional and self-reported nature of the data, the results should be interpreted as associative rather than causal. No claims of directional or causal effects are made.

SustainabilityVol. 18(15)
Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL), Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.