Defining the museum: ICOM, society, and the politics of institutional change

Over the past decades, museum studies has increasingly shifted from an object-centered focus toward critical engagement with museums’ social roles and responsibilities. However, the institutional mechanisms through which such expectations are articulated remain under examined. This article approaches successive museum definitions adopted by ICOM between 1946 and 2022 as normative institutional texts rather than neutral descriptions of practice. Employing a diachronic discursive analysis, the study examines how the concept of society has been foregrounded through various terms, such as public benefit, education, development, sustainability, and inclusion across definitional iterations. It argues that the ICOM definitions function as aspirational governance instruments that codify shifting professional imaginaries and renegotiate the museum sector’s social contract. By conceptualizing definitional change as a site of institutional boundary-making and discursive negotiation, the article contributes to critical debates on museum governance and the politics of defining cultural institutions in a global field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Museums & Social Issues
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15596893.2026.2703547
Primary Topic
Museums and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining the museum: ICOM, society, and the politics of institutional change

Asli Hetemoglu-Venedik
Museums & Social Issues
Museums and Cultural Heritage
article

Defining the museum: ICOM, society, and the politics of institutional change

Asli Hetemoglu-Venedik
article en

Abstract

Over the past decades, museum studies has increasingly shifted from an object-centered focus toward critical engagement with museums’ social roles and responsibilities. However, the institutional mechanisms through which such expectations are articulated remain under examined. This article approaches successive museum definitions adopted by ICOM between 1946 and 2022 as normative institutional texts rather than neutral descriptions of practice. Employing a diachronic discursive analysis, the study examines how the concept of society has been foregrounded through various terms, such as public benefit, education, development, sustainability, and inclusion across definitional iterations. It argues that the ICOM definitions function as aspirational governance instruments that codify shifting professional imaginaries and renegotiate the museum sector’s social contract. By conceptualizing definitional change as a site of institutional boundary-making and discursive negotiation, the article contributes to critical debates on museum governance and the politics of defining cultural institutions in a global field.

Museums & Social Issues
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Museums and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defining the museum: ICOM, society, and the politics of institutional change — Asli Hetemoglu-Venedik · Museums & Social Issues (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS