Reconstructing revolutionary intersectionality: the suppressed legacy of the Abyot Group in the Ethiopian student movement and revolution

Emerging from the revolutionary ferment of the 1960s and 1970s, the Abyot Group forged a liberation framework that challenged the dominant vanguards of the Ethiopian Student Movement. This paper argues that Abyot's central contribution was a pioneering Revolutionary Intersectionality – a theoretical synthesis that bypassed the rigid ‘stage theory’ of its rivals by integrating Maoist mass line principles with a decolonial critique of national oppression. While contemporary factions like MEISON and the EPRP prioritised a bifurcated queue of class struggle versus the ‘nationalities question’, Abyot's leadership – specifically Getachew Maru, Abiyo Ersamo, and Endreas Michael – conceptualised ethnic identity as the primary legal and moral engine of feudal-capitalist exploitation. By triangulating archival fragments from the Institute of Ethiopian Studies (IES) with participants’ affective memories, this study reconstructs Abyot's suppressed legacy. I demonstrate that their rejection of urban adventurism and their focus on the ‘internal colonialism’ of the South provide a vital, overlooked counter-narrative to the centralised official historiographies of the Ethiopian Revolution.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical African Studies
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2026.2705450
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstructing revolutionary intersectionality: the suppressed legacy of the Abyot Group in the Ethiopian student movement and revolution

Ashamo E. Gunture
Critical African Studies
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Reconstructing revolutionary intersectionality: the suppressed legacy of the Abyot Group in the Ethiopian student movement and revolution

Ashamo E. Gunture
article en

Abstract

Emerging from the revolutionary ferment of the 1960s and 1970s, the Abyot Group forged a liberation framework that challenged the dominant vanguards of the Ethiopian Student Movement. This paper argues that Abyot's central contribution was a pioneering Revolutionary Intersectionality – a theoretical synthesis that bypassed the rigid ‘stage theory’ of its rivals by integrating Maoist mass line principles with a decolonial critique of national oppression. While contemporary factions like MEISON and the EPRP prioritised a bifurcated queue of class struggle versus the ‘nationalities question’, Abyot's leadership – specifically Getachew Maru, Abiyo Ersamo, and Endreas Michael – conceptualised ethnic identity as the primary legal and moral engine of feudal-capitalist exploitation. By triangulating archival fragments from the Institute of Ethiopian Studies (IES) with participants’ affective memories, this study reconstructs Abyot's suppressed legacy. I demonstrate that their rejection of urban adventurism and their focus on the ‘internal colonialism’ of the South provide a vital, overlooked counter-narrative to the centralised official historiographies of the Ethiopian Revolution.

Critical African Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.