Which Feminisms Mobilize? Organizational Ideologies and Women’s Protest Participation Worldwide, 1980–2024

This article explores how ideological fragmentation within transnational women’s organizations influences patterns of women’s protest participation. The novel FEMPOWER dataset (1980–2024), harmonized with data from the World Values Survey and administrative political and economic data across 199 countries (N = 8,957), yields new data-driven perspectives on feminist organizing. Applying two-level linear regression models, I find that organizations grounded in social justice and difference feminist ideologies significantly boost women’s protest participation, in contrast to those aligned with neoliberal or sameness-oriented frameworks. Contrary to prevailing critiques of NGO-ization, the service-oriented organizations facilitate, rather than suppress, mobilization. These findings emphasize the role of fragmented solidarities, a form of strategic diversity, reinforcing feminist mobilization efforts rather than diluting them. It questions the premise that ideological uniformity is required for effective collective action. Instead, it demonstrates how contemporary feminism utilizes ideological fragmentation, diverse strategies, and types of engagement as sources of tactical strength.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Women Politics & Policy
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2026.2707898
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which Feminisms Mobilize? Organizational Ideologies and Women’s Protest Participation Worldwide, 1980–2024

Olga Lavrinenko
Journal of Women Politics & Policy
Gender Politics and Representation
article

Which Feminisms Mobilize? Organizational Ideologies and Women’s Protest Participation Worldwide, 1980–2024

Olga Lavrinenko
article en

Abstract

This article explores how ideological fragmentation within transnational women’s organizations influences patterns of women’s protest participation. The novel FEMPOWER dataset (1980–2024), harmonized with data from the World Values Survey and administrative political and economic data across 199 countries (N = 8,957), yields new data-driven perspectives on feminist organizing. Applying two-level linear regression models, I find that organizations grounded in social justice and difference feminist ideologies significantly boost women’s protest participation, in contrast to those aligned with neoliberal or sameness-oriented frameworks. Contrary to prevailing critiques of NGO-ization, the service-oriented organizations facilitate, rather than suppress, mobilization. These findings emphasize the role of fragmented solidarities, a form of strategic diversity, reinforcing feminist mobilization efforts rather than diluting them. It questions the premise that ideological uniformity is required for effective collective action. Instead, it demonstrates how contemporary feminism utilizes ideological fragmentation, diverse strategies, and types of engagement as sources of tactical strength.

Journal of Women Politics & Policy
University of Warsaw (PL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender Politics and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Which Feminisms Mobilize? Organizational Ideologies and Women’s Protest Participation Worldwide, 1980–2024 — Olga Lavrinenko · Journal of Women Politics & Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS