Comparison of 24 Versus 46-Hour 5-FU Infusion Durations in the Perioperative FLOT Therapy for Gastric Cancer

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 24 h versus 46 h continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion durations on pathological response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma receiving a perioperative FLOT (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) regimen. Materials and Methods: A total of 300 patients who received a perioperative FLOT regimen were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as those receiving 24 h and 46 h continuous 5-FU infusion. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared. Survival analyses were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Factors affecting pathological response were analyzed by logistic regression, and factors affecting survival were examined by Cox regression analysis. Results: Pathological response rates were found to be significantly higher in patients receiving 46 h 5-FU infusion (multivariate analysis: OR = 2.884; 95% CI: 1.619–5.138; p < 0.001). The probability of pathological response was found to be significantly lower in patients with baseline cT4 and advanced nodal stage. Median OS times were 41.23 months and 33.73 months in the 24 h and 46 h groups, respectively, with no significant difference detected between the groups (p = 0.371). In contrast, median PFS time was significantly longer in the 24 h group (38.47 months vs. 18.00 months; p < 0.001). However, in multivariate analysis, 5-FU infusion duration could not be demonstrated as an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Moderately and poorly differentiated tumors and an increased number of positive lymph nodes were found to be independent risk factors for progression. Conclusions: Although 46 h 5-FU infusion in the perioperative FLOT regimen was associated with a higher pathological response rate, this advantage was not reflected in survival outcomes. It is considered that the observed difference in PFS may stem from the clinicopathological heterogeneity between the groups. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal 5-FU infusion duration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62081444
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of 24 Versus 46-Hour 5-FU Infusion Durations in the Perioperative FLOT Therapy for Gastric Cancer

Emine Bihter Eniseler, Hüseyin Salih Semiz, Mehmet Uzun, Ozge Yetginoglu et al.
Medicina
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Comparison of 24 Versus 46-Hour 5-FU Infusion Durations in the Perioperative FLOT Therapy for Gastric Cancer

Emine Bihter Eniseler, Hüseyin Salih Semiz, Mehmet Uzun, Ozge Yetginoglu, Anıl Karakayalı, Ferhat Ekinci, Çağlar Köseoğlu, İlkay Tuğba Ünek, Ali̇ Kalem, Savaş Gökçek, Metin Kılınç, Pervin Can Sanci
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 24 h versus 46 h continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion durations on pathological response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma receiving a perioperative FLOT (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) regimen. Materials and Methods: A total of 300 patients who received a perioperative FLOT regimen were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as those receiving 24 h and 46 h continuous 5-FU infusion. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared. Survival analyses were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Factors affecting pathological response were analyzed by logistic regression, and factors affecting survival were examined by Cox regression analysis. Results: Pathological response rates were found to be significantly higher in patients receiving 46 h 5-FU infusion (multivariate analysis: OR = 2.884; 95% CI: 1.619–5.138; p < 0.001). The probability of pathological response was found to be significantly lower in patients with baseline cT4 and advanced nodal stage. Median OS times were 41.23 months and 33.73 months in the 24 h and 46 h groups, respectively, with no significant difference detected between the groups (p = 0.371). In contrast, median PFS time was significantly longer in the 24 h group (38.47 months vs. 18.00 months; p < 0.001). However, in multivariate analysis, 5-FU infusion duration could not be demonstrated as an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Moderately and poorly differentiated tumors and an increased number of positive lymph nodes were found to be independent risk factors for progression. Conclusions: Although 46 h 5-FU infusion in the perioperative FLOT regimen was associated with a higher pathological response rate, this advantage was not reflected in survival outcomes. It is considered that the observed difference in PFS may stem from the clinicopathological heterogeneity between the groups. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal 5-FU infusion duration.

MedicinaVol. 62(8)
Izmir University (TR), Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR), Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Izmir Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University (TR), Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR), Gaziantep University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.