India’s challenges in regulating unproven stem cell interventions: Recommendations to strengthen adverse event reporting

Abstract Stem cell interventions (SCIs) hold great promise, but there is little international scientific evidence to support their clinical use, and there are several critical issues persist that need to be resolved. However, many of these clinics operate outside the boundaries of scientific evidence and ethical standards, putting vulnerable patients at risk. India has emerged as a global hub for stem cell-based therapies due to the global surge in stem cell and regenerative therapies, but there is still a need for robust regulation. A critical component in ensuring the safety and efficacy of SCIs is the diligent reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and adverse events (AEs). Adverse event reporting is a crucial tool to mitigate the risks of unproven SCIs and ensuring their safe and effective use. This review examines the specific factors contributing to the underreporting of ADRs related to SCIs in India and suggests appropriate recommendations based on the study’s findings. Strengthening AE data collection and analysis will enable regulatory authorities to identify risks, implement safeguards, and inform healthcare professionals and the public, ultimately fostering safer, evidence-based adoption of SCIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in Clinical Research
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_352_25
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

India’s challenges in regulating unproven stem cell interventions: Recommendations to strengthen adverse event reporting

Kavita Srivastava, L. N. Srivastava, Tanvi Jain
Perspectives in Clinical Research
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

India’s challenges in regulating unproven stem cell interventions: Recommendations to strengthen adverse event reporting

Kavita Srivastava, L. N. Srivastava, Tanvi Jain
article en

Abstract

Abstract Stem cell interventions (SCIs) hold great promise, but there is little international scientific evidence to support their clinical use, and there are several critical issues persist that need to be resolved. However, many of these clinics operate outside the boundaries of scientific evidence and ethical standards, putting vulnerable patients at risk. India has emerged as a global hub for stem cell-based therapies due to the global surge in stem cell and regenerative therapies, but there is still a need for robust regulation. A critical component in ensuring the safety and efficacy of SCIs is the diligent reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and adverse events (AEs). Adverse event reporting is a crucial tool to mitigate the risks of unproven SCIs and ensuring their safe and effective use. This review examines the specific factors contributing to the underreporting of ADRs related to SCIs in India and suggests appropriate recommendations based on the study’s findings. Strengthening AE data collection and analysis will enable regulatory authorities to identify risks, implement safeguards, and inform healthcare professionals and the public, ultimately fostering safer, evidence-based adoption of SCIs.

Perspectives in Clinical Research
BML Munjal University (IN), University of Lucknow (IN), Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.