Tracing-based drawing method enhances anatomy learning outcomes and proportional awareness: a randomized cross-over study

Freehand drawing can support active anatomy learning but may be challenging for beginners, particularly when reproducing complex anatomical structures and proportions. The Tracing-Based Drawing Method (TBDM) combines standardized 1:1 cranial templates with transparent tracing to provide structured support during anatomy drawing practice. In this randomized cross-over study, 60 first-year medical students were assigned to two randomized method sequences ( n = 30 each). At T1, Group A used TBDM and Group B used the Traditional Memory-Based Method (TMBM) to draw the anterior skull view. At T2, the methods were crossed over and both groups drew the lateral skull view. One week later, participants repeated the anterior and lateral drawing tasks at T3 and T4, respectively. Six blinded evaluators assessed structural completeness, proportional accuracy, adjacency accuracy, and artistic quality. Drawing outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models accounting for repeated measurements, assessment occasion, and randomized group/sequence. TBDM was associated with a higher total drawing score than TMBM, with an adjusted mean difference of 11.96 points (95% CI, 11.42 to 12.51; p < 0.0001). In the timing/view sensitivity analysis, the estimated TBDM-minus-TMBM difference was 14.17 points at the immediate assessment (95% CI, 13.54 to 14.80) and 9.75 points at the one-week delayed assessment (95% CI, 9.12 to 10.38; both p < 0.0001). Learner-reported ratings also favored TBDM, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.55 points on a five-point scale (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.62; p < 0.0001). TBDM was associated with higher drawing performance and more positive learner ratings than TMBM. A positive method contrast was observed at both the immediate and one-week delayed assessments, although the difference was smaller at the delayed assessment. TBDM may provide a low-cost, structured complement to existing anatomy-learning methods. Its longer-term and transferable educational effects require further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10024-0
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracing-based drawing method enhances anatomy learning outcomes and proportional awareness: a randomized cross-over study

Yuandong Zhuang, Yan Wu, S Li, Yipeng Zhou et al.
BMC Medical Education
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Tracing-based drawing method enhances anatomy learning outcomes and proportional awareness: a randomized cross-over study

Yuandong Zhuang, Yan Wu, S Li, Yipeng Zhou, Tong Gao
article en

Abstract

Freehand drawing can support active anatomy learning but may be challenging for beginners, particularly when reproducing complex anatomical structures and proportions. The Tracing-Based Drawing Method (TBDM) combines standardized 1:1 cranial templates with transparent tracing to provide structured support during anatomy drawing practice. In this randomized cross-over study, 60 first-year medical students were assigned to two randomized method sequences ( n = 30 each). At T1, Group A used TBDM and Group B used the Traditional Memory-Based Method (TMBM) to draw the anterior skull view. At T2, the methods were crossed over and both groups drew the lateral skull view. One week later, participants repeated the anterior and lateral drawing tasks at T3 and T4, respectively. Six blinded evaluators assessed structural completeness, proportional accuracy, adjacency accuracy, and artistic quality. Drawing outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models accounting for repeated measurements, assessment occasion, and randomized group/sequence. TBDM was associated with a higher total drawing score than TMBM, with an adjusted mean difference of 11.96 points (95% CI, 11.42 to 12.51; p < 0.0001). In the timing/view sensitivity analysis, the estimated TBDM-minus-TMBM difference was 14.17 points at the immediate assessment (95% CI, 13.54 to 14.80) and 9.75 points at the one-week delayed assessment (95% CI, 9.12 to 10.38; both p < 0.0001). Learner-reported ratings also favored TBDM, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.55 points on a five-point scale (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.62; p < 0.0001). TBDM was associated with higher drawing performance and more positive learner ratings than TMBM. A positive method contrast was observed at both the immediate and one-week delayed assessments, although the difference was smaller at the delayed assessment. TBDM may provide a low-cost, structured complement to existing anatomy-learning methods. Its longer-term and transferable educational effects require further investigation.

BMC Medical Education
Fujian Medical University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (CN), Fujian Provincial Hospital (CN), Union Hospital (CN), Fuzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.