Strategies and mechanisms of precision genome engineering: From gene editing to genome writing

Abstract Genomic manipulation has advanced from stochastic nuclease‐mediated disruption toward programmable, deterministic precision. Early clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) strategies enabled targeted mutagenesis through double‐strand breaks; however, their therapeutic application is limited by genotoxicity, chromosomal instability, and dependence on endogenous repair pathways that are difficult to predict. In this review, we examined the transition from gene editing to genome writing, an approach that decouples genomic modification from host repair pathways to better balance efficiency, precision, and payload delivery. We also discussed the principles of precision technologies, including base and prime editors, and described emerging large‐scale writers, such as CRISPR‐associated transposases and recombinase‐based bridge RNAs, which enable the integration of multi‐kilobase synthetic modules. Beyond enzymatic mechanisms, we further considered the combined use of generative artificial intelligence, structural biology, and novel delivery architectures as potential strategies to overcome current biological limitations. Taken together, these developments point toward Generative Biology, in which computational design and high‐throughput screening transform the genome from a static substrate into a more dynamic model for complex, synthetic functional design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iMetaOmics.
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/imo2.70115
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies and mechanisms of precision genome engineering: From gene editing to genome writing

Hong Zhou, Liu Ls, Ningyun Zhang, Peng Xie et al.
iMetaOmics.
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Strategies and mechanisms of precision genome engineering: From gene editing to genome writing

Hong Zhou, Liu Ls, Ningyun Zhang, Peng Xie, Haoliang Hu, Xiaofei Jiang, Yue Wang, Lei Sun, Jun Yan, Jianhong Tian, Lixuan Xiang, Y M Zhang, Y Huang, Chengfeng Qiu, Wenyan Zhao, Meiqing Yang, Kerui Huang, Nanyu Kuang, Qiang Tu, Siqin Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Genomic manipulation has advanced from stochastic nuclease‐mediated disruption toward programmable, deterministic precision. Early clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) strategies enabled targeted mutagenesis through double‐strand breaks; however, their therapeutic application is limited by genotoxicity, chromosomal instability, and dependence on endogenous repair pathways that are difficult to predict. In this review, we examined the transition from gene editing to genome writing, an approach that decouples genomic modification from host repair pathways to better balance efficiency, precision, and payload delivery. We also discussed the principles of precision technologies, including base and prime editors, and described emerging large‐scale writers, such as CRISPR‐associated transposases and recombinase‐based bridge RNAs, which enable the integration of multi‐kilobase synthetic modules. Beyond enzymatic mechanisms, we further considered the combined use of generative artificial intelligence, structural biology, and novel delivery architectures as potential strategies to overcome current biological limitations. Taken together, these developments point toward Generative Biology, in which computational design and high‐throughput screening transform the genome from a static substrate into a more dynamic model for complex, synthetic functional design.

iMetaOmics.
Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CN), Huaihua University (CN), National Institute on Drug Abuse (US), Central South University (CN), Shandong University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Hunan Normal University (CN), Hunan University of Arts and Science (CN), Shanghai Normal University (CN), The First People's Hospital of Changde (CN), Hua Medicine (China) (CN), Innovation Team (China) (HK), Yueyang Changling Equipment Research Institute (China) (CN), Shanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology (CN), State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, University of South China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.