Compost and urea combination: a 15N study to smarter nitrogen recovery in tropical maize

Context Lower nitrogen (N) use efficiency and direct N losses are adversely affecting global cereal production. Yet, the exact fate of applied N in the soil and the interactions that occur are largely unknown. Aims We aimed to quantify the fate, recovery and magnitude of losses from applied N and compare the effectiveness of compost application on N recovery and yield. We hypothesised that high N losses and low N use efficiency from tropical soils can be combatted by integrated application of compost and synthetic N. Methods A randomised complete block design with two N rates and two compost rates (0 and 15 Mg ha−1) with four replicates was used. Isotopically (15N) labelled urea was applied to tropical maize and the 15N recovery, grain yield and dry matter were analyzed. Key results The combination of compost and urea increased N recovery (16% reduction in N loss), and significantly increased maize yield by 50% and stover yield by 33% in applied urea 150N (urea at 150 kg N ha−1) + compost treatment relative to the 150N only treatment, demonstrating that compost-derived N considerably increased crop N acquisition compared to urea alone. Compost addition significantly increased both apparent N recovery and mineralised N by 31% and 62%, respectively. Up to 71% N harvested was obtained from non-fertiliser sources, with 80–90% recovered in the surface 40 cm of soil. Application of urea and compost demonstrated the considerable potential to increase N recovery and enhance crop productivity of cereals. Conclusion Proving the hypothesis, beyond the effect of mineral N alone, additional organic N provided by compost significantly contributed to crop productivity and N retention in the soil. Compost is thus characterised as an ecologically balanced alternative to synthetic fertiliser, with potential decreases in losses of N, while enhancing N recovery in the plant–soil system. Implications As compost is unlikely to be commercially feasible at the rates applied and difficult to handle as a bulk, further studies should explore the most cost-effective and practical rates of compost application combined with optimised urea rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Research
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/sr25068
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compost and urea combination: a 15N study to smarter nitrogen recovery in tropical maize

S.M.W. Ranwala, David Rowlings, Clemens Scheer, Peter Grace et al.
Soil Research
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Compost and urea combination: a 15N study to smarter nitrogen recovery in tropical maize

S.M.W. Ranwala, David Rowlings, Clemens Scheer, Peter Grace, Anuga Liyanage
article en

Abstract

Context Lower nitrogen (N) use efficiency and direct N losses are adversely affecting global cereal production. Yet, the exact fate of applied N in the soil and the interactions that occur are largely unknown. Aims We aimed to quantify the fate, recovery and magnitude of losses from applied N and compare the effectiveness of compost application on N recovery and yield. We hypothesised that high N losses and low N use efficiency from tropical soils can be combatted by integrated application of compost and synthetic N. Methods A randomised complete block design with two N rates and two compost rates (0 and 15 Mg ha−1) with four replicates was used. Isotopically (15N) labelled urea was applied to tropical maize and the 15N recovery, grain yield and dry matter were analyzed. Key results The combination of compost and urea increased N recovery (16% reduction in N loss), and significantly increased maize yield by 50% and stover yield by 33% in applied urea 150N (urea at 150 kg N ha−1) + compost treatment relative to the 150N only treatment, demonstrating that compost-derived N considerably increased crop N acquisition compared to urea alone. Compost addition significantly increased both apparent N recovery and mineralised N by 31% and 62%, respectively. Up to 71% N harvested was obtained from non-fertiliser sources, with 80–90% recovered in the surface 40 cm of soil. Application of urea and compost demonstrated the considerable potential to increase N recovery and enhance crop productivity of cereals. Conclusion Proving the hypothesis, beyond the effect of mineral N alone, additional organic N provided by compost significantly contributed to crop productivity and N retention in the soil. Compost is thus characterised as an ecologically balanced alternative to synthetic fertiliser, with potential decreases in losses of N, while enhancing N recovery in the plant–soil system. Implications As compost is unlikely to be commercially feasible at the rates applied and difficult to handle as a bulk, further studies should explore the most cost-effective and practical rates of compost application combined with optimised urea rates.

Soil ResearchVol. 64(5)
University of Ruhuna (LK), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Institute for Food and Environmental Research (DE), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU), University of Colombo (LK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.