Point‐of‐View Video Recording Devices in Plastic Surgery: Educational Utility and Medicolegal Documentation Potential

INTRODUCTION: Operative video supports performance review and education, but consistent surgeon point-of-view (POV) capture in plastic and reconstructive surgery is challenging. We assessed the perceived educational effectiveness of a smart-glasses POV system and documentation/implementation considerations, including medicolegal use. METHODS: De-identified operative segments were recorded using second-generation Meta AI Glasses. Curated videos/stills were shown to consultants, trainees, and medical students, who completed an anonymous questionnaire with optional free-text. RESULTS: Thirty-five respondents participated (17 students, 12 junior doctors/registrars, 6 consultants); 24/35 (68.6%) provided free-text. Video quality and clarity/stability were rated good/excellent by 35/35 (100%); field of view and audio by 31/35 (88.6%) and 29/35 (82.9%). Documentation quality and clinically relevant detail were rated good/excellent by 33/35 (94.3%), and the added value of commentary was rated good/excellent by 32/35 (91.4%); 29/35 (82.9%) would recommend using POV recording for documentation. Educational value was strongly endorsed (34/35, 97.1% agreed POV recordings effectively teach/review technique). Patient-facing and medicolegal-related items were endorsed less consistently (22/35-30/35, 62.9%-85.7%). Consultants were more critical of the field-of-view/audio (good/excellent 50% each) and less likely than non-consultants to recommend routine documentation (1/6, 16.7% vs. 28/29, 96.6%). Free-text prioritised zoom/loupe compatibility, audio/lighting and alignment improvements, and governance around consent, privacy, storage, and access. CONCLUSION: Smart-glasses POV recording was considered a feasible, high-value adjunct to surgical education, especially when accompanied by narration. Wider adoption for routine documentation and medicolegal utility depends less on conceptual acceptance and more on resolving current technical limits and establishing robust consent, privacy, storage, access, and governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70876
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Point‐of‐View Video Recording Devices in Plastic Surgery: Educational Utility and Medicolegal Documentation Potential

Frank Bevacqua, Nelson Low, Emma Choong
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Digital Imaging in Medicine
article

Point‐of‐View Video Recording Devices in Plastic Surgery: Educational Utility and Medicolegal Documentation Potential

Frank Bevacqua, Nelson Low, Emma Choong
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Operative video supports performance review and education, but consistent surgeon point-of-view (POV) capture in plastic and reconstructive surgery is challenging. We assessed the perceived educational effectiveness of a smart-glasses POV system and documentation/implementation considerations, including medicolegal use. METHODS: De-identified operative segments were recorded using second-generation Meta AI Glasses. Curated videos/stills were shown to consultants, trainees, and medical students, who completed an anonymous questionnaire with optional free-text. RESULTS: Thirty-five respondents participated (17 students, 12 junior doctors/registrars, 6 consultants); 24/35 (68.6%) provided free-text. Video quality and clarity/stability were rated good/excellent by 35/35 (100%); field of view and audio by 31/35 (88.6%) and 29/35 (82.9%). Documentation quality and clinically relevant detail were rated good/excellent by 33/35 (94.3%), and the added value of commentary was rated good/excellent by 32/35 (91.4%); 29/35 (82.9%) would recommend using POV recording for documentation. Educational value was strongly endorsed (34/35, 97.1% agreed POV recordings effectively teach/review technique). Patient-facing and medicolegal-related items were endorsed less consistently (22/35-30/35, 62.9%-85.7%). Consultants were more critical of the field-of-view/audio (good/excellent 50% each) and less likely than non-consultants to recommend routine documentation (1/6, 16.7% vs. 28/29, 96.6%). Free-text prioritised zoom/loupe compatibility, audio/lighting and alignment improvements, and governance around consent, privacy, storage, and access. CONCLUSION: Smart-glasses POV recording was considered a feasible, high-value adjunct to surgical education, especially when accompanied by narration. Wider adoption for routine documentation and medicolegal utility depends less on conceptual acceptance and more on resolving current technical limits and establishing robust consent, privacy, storage, access, and governance.

ANZ Journal of Surgery
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Monash University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Imaging in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.