Agri-Food Byproducts as Food-Tech Material Resources: A Critical Review of Processing, Functionality, Matrix Validation, and Readiness

Agri-food byproducts are increasingly investigated as food-tech material resources, but compositional richness alone does not establish ingredient suitability. This critical narrative review evaluates plant-derived and processing residues across four representative material groups: fiber- and polysaccharide-rich powders and fractions, protein- and starch-rich materials, bioprocessed ingredients, and formulation-supporting composites. We examine how source identity, stabilization, drying, milling, fermentation, enzymatic modification, fractionation, and formulation influence hydration, interfacial behavior, gelation, rheology, texture, sensory compatibility, storage stability, and preservation-supporting performance. Evidence is interpreted across linked feedstock–processing–functionality–application–readiness gates, with separate consideration of safety, regulatory positioning, batch specifications, scale-up, techno-economic feasibility, life cycle assessment, and circularity boundaries. The practical output is a five-gate decision support and claim calibration framework that distinguishes four proposed evidence levels: Candidate, Functionality-supported, Formulation-validated, and Industry-ready potential. As a proposed non-numerical synthesis, the framework supports decision-making and claim calibration rather than ranking, certification, or regulatory approval; it identifies the evidence required before matrix-specific functional, safety, sustainability, or industry relevance claims are made.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16151588
Primary Topic
Food composition and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agri-Food Byproducts as Food-Tech Material Resources: A Critical Review of Processing, Functionality, Matrix Validation, and Readiness

Ae‐Jin Choi, Hyo Jun Won
Agriculture
Food composition and properties
article

Agri-Food Byproducts as Food-Tech Material Resources: A Critical Review of Processing, Functionality, Matrix Validation, and Readiness

Ae‐Jin Choi, Hyo Jun Won
article en

Abstract

Agri-food byproducts are increasingly investigated as food-tech material resources, but compositional richness alone does not establish ingredient suitability. This critical narrative review evaluates plant-derived and processing residues across four representative material groups: fiber- and polysaccharide-rich powders and fractions, protein- and starch-rich materials, bioprocessed ingredients, and formulation-supporting composites. We examine how source identity, stabilization, drying, milling, fermentation, enzymatic modification, fractionation, and formulation influence hydration, interfacial behavior, gelation, rheology, texture, sensory compatibility, storage stability, and preservation-supporting performance. Evidence is interpreted across linked feedstock–processing–functionality–application–readiness gates, with separate consideration of safety, regulatory positioning, batch specifications, scale-up, techno-economic feasibility, life cycle assessment, and circularity boundaries. The practical output is a five-gate decision support and claim calibration framework that distinguishes four proposed evidence levels: Candidate, Functionality-supported, Formulation-validated, and Industry-ready potential. As a proposed non-numerical synthesis, the framework supports decision-making and claim calibration rather than ranking, certification, or regulatory approval; it identifies the evidence required before matrix-specific functional, safety, sustainability, or industry relevance claims are made.

AgricultureVol. 16(15)
Rural Development Administration (KR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Food composition and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.