Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Versus Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation for Interval Sterilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: To compare the transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) approach versus conventional laparoscopy in bilateral tubal ligation for interval sterilization regarding perioperative outcomes, postoperative pain, and sexual function. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study at a tertiary center included 88 women who underwent elective tubal ligation between February 2024 and October 2025 (vNOTES: n = 39; laparoscopy: n = 49). Women aged 18-45 years seeking permanent contraception with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification ≤ 3 were included. Primary outcomes included operative time and estimated blood loss (assessed by hemoglobin/hematocrit changes). Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, postoperative pain assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6 and 24 h postoperatively, total amount of analgesic requirements and sexual function evaluated using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis used t-test/Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (vNOTES: n = 39; laparoscopy: n = 49). No significant differences were found in hemoglobin changes or operative time. vNOTES demonstrated significantly shorter hospital stay (14.90 ± 7.27 vs. 20.10 ± 3.96 h, p < 0.001), lower postoperative total amount of analgesic requirements (1.72 ± 0.76 vs. 4.88 ± 1.63 doses, p < 0.001), and reduced VAS pain scores at 6 and 24 h. No intraoperative conversions occurred. Complication rates were similar between groups (p > 0.999). FSFI scores showed no significant differences at baseline, 1, or 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: vNOTES for tubal ligation offers significant advantages in postoperative pain reduction, decreased analgesic requirements, and shorter hospital stay while maintaining comparable operative times, safety, and sexual function outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.70423
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Versus Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation for Interval Sterilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Gizem Nur Köyan, Ozan Karadeniz, Emre Kar, Yunus KATIRCI et al.
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Versus Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation for Interval Sterilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Gizem Nur Köyan, Ozan Karadeniz, Emre Kar, Yunus KATIRCI, Merve Akpınar, Turan Arda Demirag
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) approach versus conventional laparoscopy in bilateral tubal ligation for interval sterilization regarding perioperative outcomes, postoperative pain, and sexual function. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study at a tertiary center included 88 women who underwent elective tubal ligation between February 2024 and October 2025 (vNOTES: n = 39; laparoscopy: n = 49). Women aged 18-45 years seeking permanent contraception with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification ≤ 3 were included. Primary outcomes included operative time and estimated blood loss (assessed by hemoglobin/hematocrit changes). Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, postoperative pain assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6 and 24 h postoperatively, total amount of analgesic requirements and sexual function evaluated using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis used t-test/Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (vNOTES: n = 39; laparoscopy: n = 49). No significant differences were found in hemoglobin changes or operative time. vNOTES demonstrated significantly shorter hospital stay (14.90 ± 7.27 vs. 20.10 ± 3.96 h, p < 0.001), lower postoperative total amount of analgesic requirements (1.72 ± 0.76 vs. 4.88 ± 1.63 doses, p < 0.001), and reduced VAS pain scores at 6 and 24 h. No intraoperative conversions occurred. Complication rates were similar between groups (p > 0.999). FSFI scores showed no significant differences at baseline, 1, or 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: vNOTES for tubal ligation offers significant advantages in postoperative pain reduction, decreased analgesic requirements, and shorter hospital stay while maintaining comparable operative times, safety, and sexual function outcomes.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology researchVol. 52(8)
Ministry of Health (TR), Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.