Quantitative MRI to Assess Portal Pressure in Patients With Liver Disease: Validation at 3 T

ABSTRACT Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for assessing portal hypertension (PH). We previously demonstrated that a bivariate MRI model combining liver T 1 and splenic artery velocity at 1.5 T correlates with HVPG. This study aimed to evaluate this model at 3 T and investigate additional splanchnic MRI measures as potential non‐invasive markers of portal pressure. Data from 40 participants (15 metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease [MASLD]/13 alcohol‐related liver disease [ArLD]/12 other, 55 ± 14 years) scanned at 1.5 T (retrospective) and 42 participants (21 MASLD/14 ArLD/7 other, 60 ± 12 years) scanned prospectively at 3 T who underwent clinical HVPG measurement were analysed. Liver and spleen iron‐corrected T 1 (c T 1 ) were acquired using fat‐suppressed spin‐echo echo‐planar T 1 mapping, and splanchnic haemodynamics were assessed using phase‐contrast MRI. Correlations between MRI parameters and HVPG were assessed, and previously derived univariate (liver c T 1 ) and bivariate (liver c T 1 + splenic artery velocity) models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for PH (HVPG ≥ 5 mmHg), clinically significant PH (CSPH; HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg) and increased risk of mortality (HVPG ≥ 15 mmHg). Liver c T 1 at 3 T showed a strong positive correlation with HVPG across the full range (0–23 mmHg; R = 0.73, p < 0.0001). After field adjustment, pooled 1.5 and 3 T liver c T 1 maintained a strong correlation with HVPG ( R = 0.76, p < 0.0001). At 3 T, the univariate liver c T 1 model outperformed the bivariate model, achieving AUROCs of 0.74, 0.86 and 0.91 for detecting PH, CSPH and HVPG ≥ 15 mmHg, respectively. In contrast, spleen c T 1 and superior mesenteric artery velocity correlated with HVPG only up to ~15 mmHg, after which values plateaued or declined. Liver c T 1 MRI at 3 T provides a surrogate of portal pressure across the full HVPG range and outperforms a previously proposed bivariate model. Spleen and splanchnic haemodynamic measures demonstrate a ceiling effect at higher portal pressures > 15 mmHg.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NMR in Biomedicine
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70363
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative MRI to Assess Portal Pressure in Patients With Liver Disease: Validation at 3 T

Indra Neil Guha, Eleanor Cox, Susan Francis, Christopher R. Bradley et al.
NMR in Biomedicine
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

Quantitative MRI to Assess Portal Pressure in Patients With Liver Disease: Validation at 3 T

Indra Neil Guha, Eleanor Cox, Susan Francis, Christopher R. Bradley, Naaventhan Palaniyappan, Guruprasad P. Aithal, Simon Travis, Robert Scott
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for assessing portal hypertension (PH). We previously demonstrated that a bivariate MRI model combining liver T 1 and splenic artery velocity at 1.5 T correlates with HVPG. This study aimed to evaluate this model at 3 T and investigate additional splanchnic MRI measures as potential non‐invasive markers of portal pressure. Data from 40 participants (15 metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease [MASLD]/13 alcohol‐related liver disease [ArLD]/12 other, 55 ± 14 years) scanned at 1.5 T (retrospective) and 42 participants (21 MASLD/14 ArLD/7 other, 60 ± 12 years) scanned prospectively at 3 T who underwent clinical HVPG measurement were analysed. Liver and spleen iron‐corrected T 1 (c T 1 ) were acquired using fat‐suppressed spin‐echo echo‐planar T 1 mapping, and splanchnic haemodynamics were assessed using phase‐contrast MRI. Correlations between MRI parameters and HVPG were assessed, and previously derived univariate (liver c T 1 ) and bivariate (liver c T 1 + splenic artery velocity) models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for PH (HVPG ≥ 5 mmHg), clinically significant PH (CSPH; HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg) and increased risk of mortality (HVPG ≥ 15 mmHg). Liver c T 1 at 3 T showed a strong positive correlation with HVPG across the full range (0–23 mmHg; R = 0.73, p < 0.0001). After field adjustment, pooled 1.5 and 3 T liver c T 1 maintained a strong correlation with HVPG ( R = 0.76, p < 0.0001). At 3 T, the univariate liver c T 1 model outperformed the bivariate model, achieving AUROCs of 0.74, 0.86 and 0.91 for detecting PH, CSPH and HVPG ≥ 15 mmHg, respectively. In contrast, spleen c T 1 and superior mesenteric artery velocity correlated with HVPG only up to ~15 mmHg, after which values plateaued or declined. Liver c T 1 MRI at 3 T provides a surrogate of portal pressure across the full HVPG range and outperforms a previously proposed bivariate model. Spleen and splanchnic haemodynamic measures demonstrate a ceiling effect at higher portal pressures > 15 mmHg.

NMR in BiomedicineVol. 39(9)
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit (GB), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.