Contact Index for PulseSelect Catheter Apposition: Validation by Transesophageal Echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Reliable catheter-tissue apposition is important for effective pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation. The contact index, derived from real-time impedance rise on the EnSite X mapping system, may provide an objective surrogate for catheter contact; however, its utility with the PulseSelect catheter remains insufficiently defined. METHODS: In this single-center pilot study, patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with the PulseSelect catheter under general anesthesia were evaluated. High-resolution transesophageal echocardiography was used as the reference standard to classify electrode-level catheter apposition as contact or non-contact. Contact index values from electrodes 3-7 were paired with transesophageal echocardiography findings, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 316 paired imaging-electrical data points were analyzed. Interobserver agreement for transesophageal echocardiography-based contact assessment was excellent (Cohen's κ = 0.86). Contact index values were higher at contact than non-contact segments. A contact index cutoff of 10% yielded an area under the curve of 0.864, with 76.1% sensitivity and 82.9% specificity. In the central electrodes 4-6, the area under the curve was 0.871, with 80.1% sensitivity and 81.2% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Contact index was associated with transesophageal echocardiography-confirmed catheter-tissue apposition during pulsed field ablation using the PulseSelect catheter. A 10% threshold may be a useful candidate reference for real-time apposition assessment, requiring validation in larger studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70376
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contact Index for PulseSelect Catheter Apposition: Validation by Transesophageal Echocardiography

Gen Fujiwara, Yoshiaki Mizutani, Satoshi Yanagisawa, T Murohara
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Contact Index for PulseSelect Catheter Apposition: Validation by Transesophageal Echocardiography

Gen Fujiwara, Yoshiaki Mizutani, Satoshi Yanagisawa, T Murohara
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reliable catheter-tissue apposition is important for effective pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation. The contact index, derived from real-time impedance rise on the EnSite X mapping system, may provide an objective surrogate for catheter contact; however, its utility with the PulseSelect catheter remains insufficiently defined. METHODS: In this single-center pilot study, patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with the PulseSelect catheter under general anesthesia were evaluated. High-resolution transesophageal echocardiography was used as the reference standard to classify electrode-level catheter apposition as contact or non-contact. Contact index values from electrodes 3-7 were paired with transesophageal echocardiography findings, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 316 paired imaging-electrical data points were analyzed. Interobserver agreement for transesophageal echocardiography-based contact assessment was excellent (Cohen's κ = 0.86). Contact index values were higher at contact than non-contact segments. A contact index cutoff of 10% yielded an area under the curve of 0.864, with 76.1% sensitivity and 82.9% specificity. In the central electrodes 4-6, the area under the curve was 0.871, with 80.1% sensitivity and 81.2% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Contact index was associated with transesophageal echocardiography-confirmed catheter-tissue apposition during pulsed field ablation using the PulseSelect catheter. A 10% threshold may be a useful candidate reference for real-time apposition assessment, requiring validation in larger studies.

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital (JP), Nagoya University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.