Matrix‐Dependent Multi‐Impact Behavior of Cylindrical Composite Tubes: A Comparative Study

ABSTRACT This study evaluates the effect of resin type on the single‐ and multi‐impact behavior of cylindrical composite tubes. Two resin systems, epoxy and polyester, were tested, exhibiting distinct mechanical performance and cost. Under a 20 J single impact, E‐glass/epoxy tubes reached a peak load of 3.63 kN with a maximum displacement of 10.73 mm and an initial impact bending stiffness of 238 N/mm. E‐glass/polyester tubes, in contrast, reached 2.06 kN, 8.61 mm, and 91.8 N/mm, respectively, showing more ductile and distributed damage. In multi‐impact tests, fatigue life decreased with increasing impact energy. Epoxy composites sustained 26 impacts before perforation at 30 J, whereas polyester tubes required 24 J. Below 9 J (~200 cycles), polyester tubes outperformed epoxy, highlighting a trade‐off between performance and cost. The superior impact resistance of epoxy is linked to stronger fiber–matrix interfacial bonding and enhanced stiffness, while polyester offers economic advantages under lower‐energy conditions. These findings demonstrate that matrix selection critically governs energy absorption, damage tolerance, and impact fatigue performance in composite tubular structures, providing practical guidance for designing resilient and cost‐effective systems under repeated impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.71441
Primary Topic
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Matrix‐Dependent Multi‐Impact Behavior of Cylindrical Composite Tubes: A Comparative Study

Abderrezak Bezazi, Paulo N. B. Reis, Fabrizio Scarpa, Abdelkader Hocine et al.
Polymer Composites
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
article

Matrix‐Dependent Multi‐Impact Behavior of Cylindrical Composite Tubes: A Comparative Study

Abderrezak Bezazi, Paulo N. B. Reis, Fabrizio Scarpa, Abdelkader Hocine, Mohammed Bettayeb, Khaled Bachioua
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study evaluates the effect of resin type on the single‐ and multi‐impact behavior of cylindrical composite tubes. Two resin systems, epoxy and polyester, were tested, exhibiting distinct mechanical performance and cost. Under a 20 J single impact, E‐glass/epoxy tubes reached a peak load of 3.63 kN with a maximum displacement of 10.73 mm and an initial impact bending stiffness of 238 N/mm. E‐glass/polyester tubes, in contrast, reached 2.06 kN, 8.61 mm, and 91.8 N/mm, respectively, showing more ductile and distributed damage. In multi‐impact tests, fatigue life decreased with increasing impact energy. Epoxy composites sustained 26 impacts before perforation at 30 J, whereas polyester tubes required 24 J. Below 9 J (~200 cycles), polyester tubes outperformed epoxy, highlighting a trade‐off between performance and cost. The superior impact resistance of epoxy is linked to stronger fiber–matrix interfacial bonding and enhanced stiffness, while polyester offers economic advantages under lower‐energy conditions. These findings demonstrate that matrix selection critically governs energy absorption, damage tolerance, and impact fatigue performance in composite tubular structures, providing practical guidance for designing resilient and cost‐effective systems under repeated impacts.

Polymer Composites
University of Bristol (GB), National Composites Centre (GB), University of Guelma (DZ), Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef (DZ), University of Coimbra (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.