Comparative Evaluation of Quantitative Real-Time PCR and a Laboratory-Developed Chip-Based Real-Time Digital PCR for JAK2 V617F Allele Burden in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Background: Precise quantification of JAK2 V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) is clinically important in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). This study evaluated the analytical performance and clinical utility of a laboratory-developed chip-based real-time digital PCR (dPCR) assay for JAK2 V617F and compared it with a commercial quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay. Methods: Residual DNA extracts from 76 JAK2 V617F-positive clinical specimens collected from patients with suspected MPNs were analyzed using both qPCR and dPCR. Analytical performance was assessed according to CLSI-based approaches, including limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), precision, linearity, and method comparison. Associations between VAF and hematologic parameters, as well as diagnostic groups, were also examined. Results: Both methods showed a LoB of 0. The LoD was 0.1167% for qPCR and 0.0846% for dPCR, and dPCR demonstrated lower variability than qPCR across high-, intermediate-, and low-concentration samples, with the largest difference observed at low VAF levels. Linearity was excellent for both assays (R2 = 0.988 for qPCR and 0.999 for dPCR), although dPCR showed less low-concentration bias. The two methods were highly correlated (Pearson r = 0.9789, R2 = 0.958), but dPCR yielded slightly higher VAF values overall. VAF was significantly higher in polycythemia vera than in essential thrombocythemia, and both qPCR- and dPCR-based VAFs were positively correlated with white blood cell count. Conclusions: The chip-based laboratory-developed dPCR assay showed high concordance with qPCR while providing lower LoD and better precision at low allele burden. These findings support its potential utility as a sensitive alternative for JAK2 V617F quantification in clinical laboratories, particularly in settings requiring accurate low-level detection and follow-up monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152333
Primary Topic
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Quantitative Real-Time PCR and a Laboratory-Developed Chip-Based Real-Time Digital PCR for JAK2 V617F Allele Burden in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Sunggyun Park, Kyoung Bo Kim, Jung‐Sook Ha
Diagnostics
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparative Evaluation of Quantitative Real-Time PCR and a Laboratory-Developed Chip-Based Real-Time Digital PCR for JAK2 V617F Allele Burden in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Sunggyun Park, Kyoung Bo Kim, Jung‐Sook Ha
article en

Abstract

Background: Precise quantification of JAK2 V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) is clinically important in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). This study evaluated the analytical performance and clinical utility of a laboratory-developed chip-based real-time digital PCR (dPCR) assay for JAK2 V617F and compared it with a commercial quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay. Methods: Residual DNA extracts from 76 JAK2 V617F-positive clinical specimens collected from patients with suspected MPNs were analyzed using both qPCR and dPCR. Analytical performance was assessed according to CLSI-based approaches, including limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), precision, linearity, and method comparison. Associations between VAF and hematologic parameters, as well as diagnostic groups, were also examined. Results: Both methods showed a LoB of 0. The LoD was 0.1167% for qPCR and 0.0846% for dPCR, and dPCR demonstrated lower variability than qPCR across high-, intermediate-, and low-concentration samples, with the largest difference observed at low VAF levels. Linearity was excellent for both assays (R2 = 0.988 for qPCR and 0.999 for dPCR), although dPCR showed less low-concentration bias. The two methods were highly correlated (Pearson r = 0.9789, R2 = 0.958), but dPCR yielded slightly higher VAF values overall. VAF was significantly higher in polycythemia vera than in essential thrombocythemia, and both qPCR- and dPCR-based VAFs were positively correlated with white blood cell count. Conclusions: The chip-based laboratory-developed dPCR assay showed high concordance with qPCR while providing lower LoD and better precision at low allele burden. These findings support its potential utility as a sensitive alternative for JAK2 V617F quantification in clinical laboratories, particularly in settings requiring accurate low-level detection and follow-up monitoring.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(15)
Keimyung University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.