Can agri-environmental schemes be designed to meet EU habitat restoration goals for semi-natural habitats? An interdisciplinary case study

Semi-natural grasslands and wooded pastures are biodiversity-rich but declining habitats that depend on continued management, mostly by farmers. In the EU, agri-environmental schemes (AESs) under the Common Agricultural Policy are key instruments for conserving these habitats. We examined how the design and implementation of the Finnish AES for semi-natural habitats align with EU restoration objectives and farmer decision-making and behaviour. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to combine farmer survey data on motives and knowledge with evaluations of management performance, site characteristics, and payment design. Results show that the scheme provides significant additionality, but habitat management remains unprofitable or a low economic priority for most farmers, and weaknesses in payment design, contract management, and enforcement constrain targeting and restoration outcomes. We conclude that achieving EU restoration targets will require increasing the relative economic importance of habitat management, redesigning payments, and improving contract management and enforcement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02452-5
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can agri-environmental schemes be designed to meet EU habitat restoration goals for semi-natural habitats? An interdisciplinary case study

Maarit Jokinen, Hilja Kohonen
AMBIO
Environmental Conservation and Management
article

Can agri-environmental schemes be designed to meet EU habitat restoration goals for semi-natural habitats? An interdisciplinary case study

Maarit Jokinen, Hilja Kohonen
article en

Abstract

Semi-natural grasslands and wooded pastures are biodiversity-rich but declining habitats that depend on continued management, mostly by farmers. In the EU, agri-environmental schemes (AESs) under the Common Agricultural Policy are key instruments for conserving these habitats. We examined how the design and implementation of the Finnish AES for semi-natural habitats align with EU restoration objectives and farmer decision-making and behaviour. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to combine farmer survey data on motives and knowledge with evaluations of management performance, site characteristics, and payment design. Results show that the scheme provides significant additionality, but habitat management remains unprofitable or a low economic priority for most farmers, and weaknesses in payment design, contract management, and enforcement constrain targeting and restoration outcomes. We conclude that achieving EU restoration targets will require increasing the relative economic importance of habitat management, redesigning payments, and improving contract management and enforcement.

AMBIO
University of Eastern Finland (FI), Finnish Environment Institute (FI)
Koneen Säätiö, Suomen Ympäristökeskus
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental Conservation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can agri-environmental schemes be designed to meet EU habitat restoration goals for semi-natural habitats? An interdisciplinary case study — Maarit Jokinen, Hilja Kohonen · AMBIO (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS