From Substance to Relation: Logical Faults of the Mass Concept and Its Reconstruction in Time Field Theory

This paper systematically dissects three deep logical faults underlying the traditional concept of mass in physics: the circular argumentation of mass calibration that presupposes gravitational coupling and the equivalence principle; the metaphysical presupposition of mass invariance without operational support; and the axiomatic dependence of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass that cannot be proven from first principles. We argue that these faults are not missing technical details, but inevitable products of the ontological commitment in the field-source dualist paradigm, where mass is presupposed as an intrinsic property independent of metric benchmarks. Based on the periodic metric monism of Time Field Theory (TFT), this paper proposes a thoroughly reconstructed concept of mass: mass is not a substantial property, but the relational strength between the gradient and the local value of the periodic metric field, formally expressed as \kappa\rho = (\nabla\gamma)^2/\gamma. This definition is strictly derived endogenously from the core axiom of flux conservation and fully anchored in operational definitions. Mass, gravity and inertia are no longer independent properties whose equivalence needs to be proven, but apparent values of the same metric grammar under different operational scenarios. The new conception of mass demotes the equivalence principle from an unquestionable axiom to a derivable logical theorem, and naturally resolves the puzzle of the "universal coincidence" in Eötvös-type experiments. We further present conceptual confirmations for puzzles such as dark matter and black hole singularities, and propose rigid falsifiable observational criteria, including a strong-field equivalence principle deviation test that directly examines the relational nature of mass. Full quantitative derivations of the three major phenomenological effects are presented in companion papers of the TFT series.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21609857
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

From Substance to Relation: Logical Faults of the Mass Concept and Its Reconstruction in Time Field Theory

Huowang Huang
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
preprint

From Substance to Relation: Logical Faults of the Mass Concept and Its Reconstruction in Time Field Theory

Huowang Huang
preprint en

Abstract

This paper systematically dissects three deep logical faults underlying the traditional concept of mass in physics: the circular argumentation of mass calibration that presupposes gravitational coupling and the equivalence principle; the metaphysical presupposition of mass invariance without operational support; and the axiomatic dependence of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass that cannot be proven from first principles. We argue that these faults are not missing technical details, but inevitable products of the ontological commitment in the field-source dualist paradigm, where mass is presupposed as an intrinsic property independent of metric benchmarks. Based on the periodic metric monism of Time Field Theory (TFT), this paper proposes a thoroughly reconstructed concept of mass: mass is not a substantial property, but the relational strength between the gradient and the local value of the periodic metric field, formally expressed as \kappa\rho = (\nabla\gamma)^2/\gamma. This definition is strictly derived endogenously from the core axiom of flux conservation and fully anchored in operational definitions. Mass, gravity and inertia are no longer independent properties whose equivalence needs to be proven, but apparent values of the same metric grammar under different operational scenarios. The new conception of mass demotes the equivalence principle from an unquestionable axiom to a derivable logical theorem, and naturally resolves the puzzle of the "universal coincidence" in Eötvös-type experiments. We further present conceptual confirmations for puzzles such as dark matter and black hole singularities, and propose rigid falsifiable observational criteria, including a strong-field equivalence principle deviation test that directly examines the relational nature of mass. Full quantitative derivations of the three major phenomenological effects are presented in companion papers of the TFT series.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Substance to Relation: Logical Faults of the Mass Concept and Its Reconstruction in Time Field Theory — Huowang Huang · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS