Comparative Performance of Mechanistic, Statistical, and Hybrid Models of Forecasting Dengue Fever Incidence in Somalia. A Retrospective Time Series Analysis

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Dengue fever is a growing menace in Somalia, a climate change prone region with a weak healthcare system. An imperative of public health is effective forecasting models. This paper will provide a detailed comparative analysis comparing mechanistic, statistical, and hybrid models in order to find the best forecasting model to use in this data‐sparse situation of dengue fever. Methods We utilized raw reported annual incidence data of dengue (1990–2021, N = 32) obtained from Our World in Data. Due to the lack of standardized case definitions and high under‐reporting inherent to Somalia's surveillance system, forecasts represent the projected reported burden rather than true infection rates. The data was divided into a training and a testing set (1990–2016 and 2017–2021, respectively). We tested a mechanistic Susceptible‐Infected‐Recovered (SIR) model, 8 single time series models (ARIMA, ETS, TBATS, and NNAR), and 12 hybrids using an averaging ensemble strategy. Findings Although the time series models (individually) offered the basics of predictive power, the hybrid ARIMA‐TBATS model was the most successful and it surpassed the other models. It performed the highest accuracy statistics on the testing data with a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 6.49% and a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 663.81 and outperformed the best single model (TBATS) which had a MAPE of 7.14%. The basic reproduction number () calculated by the SIR model was 1.015 which shows that the disease is endemic. Conclusion This paper concludes that the ARIMA‐TBATS hybrid should be the most empirically effective tool out of the ones considered when planning to forecast dengue in Somalia. Real‐World Application: This ARIMA‐TBATS framework is designed to serve as the mathematical engine for a National Dengue Early Warning System (DEWS) in Somalia, allowing public health officials to physically preempt outbreaks by routing medical supplies, mobilizing fumigation teams, and distributing bed nets to high‐risk zones months before peak incidence occurs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Science Reports
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.72822
Primary Topic
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance of Mechanistic, Statistical, and Hybrid Models of Forecasting Dengue Fever Incidence in Somalia. A Retrospective Time Series Analysis

Saralees Nadarajah, Abdisalam Hassan Muse, Abdiftah Mohamud Abdi
Health Science Reports
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
article

Comparative Performance of Mechanistic, Statistical, and Hybrid Models of Forecasting Dengue Fever Incidence in Somalia. A Retrospective Time Series Analysis

Saralees Nadarajah, Abdisalam Hassan Muse, Abdiftah Mohamud Abdi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Dengue fever is a growing menace in Somalia, a climate change prone region with a weak healthcare system. An imperative of public health is effective forecasting models. This paper will provide a detailed comparative analysis comparing mechanistic, statistical, and hybrid models in order to find the best forecasting model to use in this data‐sparse situation of dengue fever. Methods We utilized raw reported annual incidence data of dengue (1990–2021, N = 32) obtained from Our World in Data. Due to the lack of standardized case definitions and high under‐reporting inherent to Somalia's surveillance system, forecasts represent the projected reported burden rather than true infection rates. The data was divided into a training and a testing set (1990–2016 and 2017–2021, respectively). We tested a mechanistic Susceptible‐Infected‐Recovered (SIR) model, 8 single time series models (ARIMA, ETS, TBATS, and NNAR), and 12 hybrids using an averaging ensemble strategy. Findings Although the time series models (individually) offered the basics of predictive power, the hybrid ARIMA‐TBATS model was the most successful and it surpassed the other models. It performed the highest accuracy statistics on the testing data with a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 6.49% and a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 663.81 and outperformed the best single model (TBATS) which had a MAPE of 7.14%. The basic reproduction number () calculated by the SIR model was 1.015 which shows that the disease is endemic. Conclusion This paper concludes that the ARIMA‐TBATS hybrid should be the most empirically effective tool out of the ones considered when planning to forecast dengue in Somalia. Real‐World Application: This ARIMA‐TBATS framework is designed to serve as the mathematical engine for a National Dengue Early Warning System (DEWS) in Somalia, allowing public health officials to physically preempt outbreaks by routing medical supplies, mobilizing fumigation teams, and distributing bed nets to high‐risk zones months before peak incidence occurs.

Health Science ReportsVol. 9(8)
University of Manchester (GB), Amoud University (SO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.