<i>Sir</i> and <i>Guys</i> in 20th‐ and 21st‐Century American English

ABSTRACT This paper examines the diachronic development of formal and informal address and reference terms in American English as an effect of democratization using the COHA corpus (1900–2020). In focus are two address/reference terms with especially drastic frequency trends in the timespan investigated: the honorific sir , which declines sharply from the 1960s onward, and the familiarizer guys , which shows a strong and continuous increase over the entire period. Based on a qualitative analysis of a random sample of both terms, categorizing speaker—addressee/speaker—referent relationships as well as contextual and tonal factors, we are able to show that guys has expanded from a highly informal, colloquial address term in the early 20th century to one that is acceptable in various neutral contexts in present‐day American English. In contrast, sir becomes confined to relatively restricted settings, particularly those maintaining formal power structures (such as the military) and in service encounters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Englishes
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.70044
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sir and Guys in 20th‐ and 21st‐Century American English

Svenja Kranich, Hanna Bruns
World Englishes
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Sir and Guys in 20th‐ and 21st‐Century American English

Svenja Kranich, Hanna Bruns
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the diachronic development of formal and informal address and reference terms in American English as an effect of democratization using the COHA corpus (1900–2020). In focus are two address/reference terms with especially drastic frequency trends in the timespan investigated: the honorific sir , which declines sharply from the 1960s onward, and the familiarizer guys , which shows a strong and continuous increase over the entire period. Based on a qualitative analysis of a random sample of both terms, categorizing speaker—addressee/speaker—referent relationships as well as contextual and tonal factors, we are able to show that guys has expanded from a highly informal, colloquial address term in the early 20th century to one that is acceptable in various neutral contexts in present‐day American English. In contrast, sir becomes confined to relatively restricted settings, particularly those maintaining formal power structures (such as the military) and in service encounters.

World Englishes
University of Bonn (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.