Exercise Snacks Are Feasible to Perform in the Real World and Improve Physical Capacity for Adults Living With Non‐Insulin Treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomised Trial

ABSTRACT Aims To investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a 12‐week remotely‐delivered exercise snacks (ES) intervention in adults with type 2 diabetes. Material and Methods Insufficiently active adults with type 2 diabetes ( N = 69; 46 females; mean age ± SD: 58 ± 11 years) were randomised to an ES or mobility/stretching comparator group (CON), which involved 4 × 1‐min bouts of either vigorous or low intensity exercise, respectively, on ≥ 5 days/week. The primary outcome was feasibility based on adherence. Secondary outcomes included exercise enjoyment (1–7 scale), rating of perceived exertion (RPE; 0–10 scale), heart rate (HR), haemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ), blood biomarkers of cardiometabolic health, 30‐s sit‐to‐stand capacity, grip strength, estimated maximal oxygen uptake, and anthropometrics. Results Weekly adherence (estimated marginal mean [95% confidence interval]: 18 bouts [16–21] for both groups; p = 0.99) and total enjoyment (ES: 4.5 [4.1–4.8] vs. CON: 4.3 [4.0–4.7]; p = 0.64) were high and not different between groups. Despite higher RPE (5.7 [5.4–6.1]) and peak HR (73 [70–77] % of age‐predicted HR maximum) in ES versus CON (2.0 [1.7–2.4] and 61 [58–64] % of age‐predicted HR maximum, respectively) (all p < 0.001), there were no between‐group differences in the change in any secondary outcome (all p > 0.05) except for greater sit‐to‐stand capacity in ES after training (between‐group effect estimate [95% confidence interval]: 1.9 repetitions [0.3–3.4]; p = 0.02). Conclusions Exercise snacks were feasible to perform in the real world and improved sit‐to‐stand capacity to a greater extent than CON in adults living with type 2 diabetes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06407245

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71052
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exercise Snacks Are Feasible to Perform in the Real World and Improve Physical Capacity for Adults Living With Non‐Insulin Treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomised Trial

Jonathan P. Little, Kaja Falkenhain, Mary Elizabeth Jung, Kenneth Madden et al.
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Physical Activity and Health
article

Exercise Snacks Are Feasible to Perform in the Real World and Improve Physical Capacity for Adults Living With Non‐Insulin Treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomised Trial

Jonathan P. Little, Kaja Falkenhain, Mary Elizabeth Jung, Kenneth Madden, Hashim Islam, Martin J. Gibala, Alexis Marcotte‐Chénard, Joel Singer, Seth F. McCarthy, Michael Charles Riddell, Fiona J. Babir, Roderick E. Sandilands, Noah Mulkewich, Douglas L. Richards
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims To investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a 12‐week remotely‐delivered exercise snacks (ES) intervention in adults with type 2 diabetes. Material and Methods Insufficiently active adults with type 2 diabetes ( N = 69; 46 females; mean age ± SD: 58 ± 11 years) were randomised to an ES or mobility/stretching comparator group (CON), which involved 4 × 1‐min bouts of either vigorous or low intensity exercise, respectively, on ≥ 5 days/week. The primary outcome was feasibility based on adherence. Secondary outcomes included exercise enjoyment (1–7 scale), rating of perceived exertion (RPE; 0–10 scale), heart rate (HR), haemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ), blood biomarkers of cardiometabolic health, 30‐s sit‐to‐stand capacity, grip strength, estimated maximal oxygen uptake, and anthropometrics. Results Weekly adherence (estimated marginal mean [95% confidence interval]: 18 bouts [16–21] for both groups; p = 0.99) and total enjoyment (ES: 4.5 [4.1–4.8] vs. CON: 4.3 [4.0–4.7]; p = 0.64) were high and not different between groups. Despite higher RPE (5.7 [5.4–6.1]) and peak HR (73 [70–77] % of age‐predicted HR maximum) in ES versus CON (2.0 [1.7–2.4] and 61 [58–64] % of age‐predicted HR maximum, respectively) (all p < 0.001), there were no between‐group differences in the change in any secondary outcome (all p > 0.05) except for greater sit‐to‐stand capacity in ES after training (between‐group effect estimate [95% confidence interval]: 1.9 repetitions [0.3–3.4]; p = 0.02). Conclusions Exercise snacks were feasible to perform in the real world and improved sit‐to‐stand capacity to a greater extent than CON in adults living with type 2 diabetes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06407245

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US), Louisiana State University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), York University (CA), Cégep de l'Outaouais (CA), Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA), University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA), Okanagan University College (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.