On the Nature of Human Physical Cognition: Limited Fitting, StageDependent Validity, and Awe for Cosmic Laws

In the history of physics, there exists a common misinterpretation: the awe felt by scientists toward the objective order of the universe is misread as belief in metaphysics or a personal deity. All human understandings of nature are essentially fittings of objective laws. Mathematical fitting is only one form of fitting, and fitting results are only locally and stagedependently valid. No manmade theory can be equated with the ontological truth of the universe. Constrained by individual lifespan and cognitive limits, researchers’ sense of awe in face of infinite cosmic laws reflects rational perception rather than a turn toward theological belief. Furthermore, no human being can fully break free from the ideological context of their era; it is inappropriate to judge historical scientists solely by modern standards. This paper identifies prevalent cognitive fallacies, draws a clear line between reverence for objective laws and metaphysical superstition, and establishes a rational standpoint for understanding physical cognition.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21612889
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

On the Nature of Human Physical Cognition: Limited Fitting, StageDependent Validity, and Awe for Cosmic Laws

Jiaqing Yan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
preprint

On the Nature of Human Physical Cognition: Limited Fitting, StageDependent Validity, and Awe for Cosmic Laws

Jiaqing Yan
preprint en

Abstract

In the history of physics, there exists a common misinterpretation: the awe felt by scientists toward the objective order of the universe is misread as belief in metaphysics or a personal deity. All human understandings of nature are essentially fittings of objective laws. Mathematical fitting is only one form of fitting, and fitting results are only locally and stagedependently valid. No manmade theory can be equated with the ontological truth of the universe. Constrained by individual lifespan and cognitive limits, researchers’ sense of awe in face of infinite cosmic laws reflects rational perception rather than a turn toward theological belief. Furthermore, no human being can fully break free from the ideological context of their era; it is inappropriate to judge historical scientists solely by modern standards. This paper identifies prevalent cognitive fallacies, draws a clear line between reverence for objective laws and metaphysical superstition, and establishes a rational standpoint for understanding physical cognition.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.