Efficacy of <scp>CagriSema</scp> for Reaching Anthropometric Treatment Targets and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Secondary, <scp> <i>Post hoc</i> </scp> Analysis of <scp>REDEFINE</scp> 1

ABSTRACT Aims To assess the added value of absolute anthropometric targets alongside percentage weight loss in the clinical management of obesity. Materials and Methods The phase 3a, 68‐week REDEFINE 1 trial randomised adults without diabetes with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 , or ≥ 27 kg/m 2 with ≥ 1 obesity‐related complication, to once‐weekly CagriSema 2.4 mg/2.4 mg, semaglutide 2.4 mg, cagrilintide 2.4 mg, or placebo, plus lifestyle intervention. This secondary, post hoc analysis assessed the proportions of participants achieving BMI &lt; 27 kg/m 2 and/or WHtR &lt; 0.53 targets, and percentage weight loss by anthropometric target. The association between the proportion of participants maintaining or achieving normalisation of four cardiometabolic outcomes: normoglycemia (glycated haemoglobin &lt; 5.7% and fasting plasma glucose &lt; 5.6 mmol/L); blood pressure (&lt; 130/80 mmHg); triglycerides (&lt; 1.7 mmol/L); lipids (high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 1.3 mmol/L [female] or ≥ 1.0 mmol/L [male]) and reaching anthropometric targets or change in body weight (%) was also assessed. Results The proportion of participants achieving both BMI &lt; 27 kg/m 2 and WHtR &lt; 0.53 targets at week 68 was 30.3%, 19.1%, 9.0%, and 3.3% in participants who received CagriSema, semaglutide, cagrilintide, or placebo respectively. Both BMI and WHtR performed similarly as indicators for all four cardiometabolic outcomes. At more stringent cut‐off values, anthropometric targets were better measures than percentage weight loss. Conclusions The proportion of participants achieving anthropometric targets was greater with CagriSema Versus other treatments. These findings support further validation of BMI and WHtR anthropometric treatment targets and indicate a potential for indicating amelioration of clinical outcomes in obesity and a greater emphasis on target‐based treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71134
Primary Topic
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of CagriSema for Reaching Anthropometric Treatment Targets and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Secondary, Post hoc Analysis of REDEFINE 1

Carel Wynand le Roux, Claire Prener Miller, Timothy Garvey, Mikkel Hovden Christensen et al.
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
article

Efficacy of CagriSema for Reaching Anthropometric Treatment Targets and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Secondary, Post hoc Analysis of REDEFINE 1

Carel Wynand le Roux, Claire Prener Miller, Timothy Garvey, Mikkel Hovden Christensen, Luca Busetto, Volker Schnecke, Barbara McGowan, Deborah B. Horn, Cynthia Osorto Contreras
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims To assess the added value of absolute anthropometric targets alongside percentage weight loss in the clinical management of obesity. Materials and Methods The phase 3a, 68‐week REDEFINE 1 trial randomised adults without diabetes with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 , or ≥ 27 kg/m 2 with ≥ 1 obesity‐related complication, to once‐weekly CagriSema 2.4 mg/2.4 mg, semaglutide 2.4 mg, cagrilintide 2.4 mg, or placebo, plus lifestyle intervention. This secondary, post hoc analysis assessed the proportions of participants achieving BMI &lt; 27 kg/m 2 and/or WHtR &lt; 0.53 targets, and percentage weight loss by anthropometric target. The association between the proportion of participants maintaining or achieving normalisation of four cardiometabolic outcomes: normoglycemia (glycated haemoglobin &lt; 5.7% and fasting plasma glucose &lt; 5.6 mmol/L); blood pressure (&lt; 130/80 mmHg); triglycerides (&lt; 1.7 mmol/L); lipids (high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 1.3 mmol/L [female] or ≥ 1.0 mmol/L [male]) and reaching anthropometric targets or change in body weight (%) was also assessed. Results The proportion of participants achieving both BMI &lt; 27 kg/m 2 and WHtR &lt; 0.53 targets at week 68 was 30.3%, 19.1%, 9.0%, and 3.3% in participants who received CagriSema, semaglutide, cagrilintide, or placebo respectively. Both BMI and WHtR performed similarly as indicators for all four cardiometabolic outcomes. At more stringent cut‐off values, anthropometric targets were better measures than percentage weight loss. Conclusions The proportion of participants achieving anthropometric targets was greater with CagriSema Versus other treatments. These findings support further validation of BMI and WHtR anthropometric treatment targets and indicate a potential for indicating amelioration of clinical outcomes in obesity and a greater emphasis on target‐based treatment strategies.

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
University College Dublin (IE), University of Padua (IT), University of Ulster (GB), Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.