Racing for DAOs: progress and pitfalls in jurisdictional competition

This article critically evaluates the regulatory landscape surrounding decentralised autonomous organisations (DAOs) in the context of Web3. Referring to the concepts of ‘race to the bottom', ‘race to the top' and the triviality hypothesis, it analyses the regulatory competition faced by DAOs and the core issues of this purported regulatory race in jurisdictions such as Wyoming and the Marshall Islands, including KYC/AML compliance, profit status and taxation and managerial standards. The article argues that while certain jurisdictions offer minimal regulatory requirements to attract DAOs, this approach poses risks to long-term sustainability, accountability and transparency of DAOs. It suggests specific directions for a ‘race to the top’ which entail comprehensive regulatory structures that balance innovation with essential safeguards. This article concludes with a critical reflection on the reality of no obvious substantial regulatory interest in DAOs and evaluates the implications of this regulatory inertia for the future of decentralised governance organisational structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Innovation and Technology
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2026.2705114
Primary Topic
Auction Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racing for DAOs: progress and pitfalls in jurisdictional competition

Kwan Yiu Cheng
Law Innovation and Technology
Auction Theory and Applications
article

Racing for DAOs: progress and pitfalls in jurisdictional competition

Kwan Yiu Cheng
article en

Abstract

This article critically evaluates the regulatory landscape surrounding decentralised autonomous organisations (DAOs) in the context of Web3. Referring to the concepts of ‘race to the bottom', ‘race to the top' and the triviality hypothesis, it analyses the regulatory competition faced by DAOs and the core issues of this purported regulatory race in jurisdictions such as Wyoming and the Marshall Islands, including KYC/AML compliance, profit status and taxation and managerial standards. The article argues that while certain jurisdictions offer minimal regulatory requirements to attract DAOs, this approach poses risks to long-term sustainability, accountability and transparency of DAOs. It suggests specific directions for a ‘race to the top’ which entail comprehensive regulatory structures that balance innovation with essential safeguards. This article concludes with a critical reflection on the reality of no obvious substantial regulatory interest in DAOs and evaluates the implications of this regulatory inertia for the future of decentralised governance organisational structures.

Law Innovation and Technology
City, University of London (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Auction Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.