Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Integrated Care Model on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer surgery is associated with significant perioperative morbidity, including pulmonary complications and psychological distress. The effectiveness of comprehensive interdisciplinary care models in improving outcomes remains insufficiently studied. METHODS: This single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled 240 patients undergoing lung cancer surgery between March 2021 and December 2023. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either an interdisciplinary integrated care intervention (n = 120) or standard care (n = 120). The intervention included preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation, psychological support, nutritional optimization, and enhanced postoperative recovery protocols. The primary outcome was postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), pain scores, functional recovery (6-min walk distance), psychological status (HADS), and quality of life (QLQ-C30). Intention-to-treat analysis was performed as the primary analysis. RESULTS: In the ITT analysis, the intervention group had significantly shorter LOS compared to control (7.43 ± 1.94 vs. 9.02 ± 2.30 days; mean difference 1.59 days, 95% CI: 1.07-2.12; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.75). After adjusting for baseline FEV1 imbalance, the difference remained significant (adjusted mean difference 1.54 days, 95% CI: 1.02-2.06; p < 0.001). PPCs were significantly lower in the intervention group (12.0% vs. 26.1%; RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.81; p = 0.008). The intervention group demonstrated superior functional recovery, with 6-min walk distance differences of 57.77 m at 1 month and 61.97 m at 3 months, both exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 22-42 m. Psychological outcomes (HADS-anxiety: 4.19 ± 2.55 vs. 6.48 ± 3.22; HADS-Depression: 3.57 ± 1.97 vs. 5.19 ± 2.89 at 3 months; both p < 0.001) and quality of life were significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: An interdisciplinary integrated care model significantly reduces hospital stay, decreases pulmonary complications, and improves functional and psychological outcomes in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. These findings support the implementation of comprehensive perioperative care programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70841
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Integrated Care Model on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Xingu Chen, Shuting Liu, Shuping Liang, 张妮莉 et al.
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Integrated Care Model on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Xingu Chen, Shuting Liu, Shuping Liang, 张妮莉, Ying Liu, Xi Zhang, Yu Yan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer surgery is associated with significant perioperative morbidity, including pulmonary complications and psychological distress. The effectiveness of comprehensive interdisciplinary care models in improving outcomes remains insufficiently studied. METHODS: This single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled 240 patients undergoing lung cancer surgery between March 2021 and December 2023. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either an interdisciplinary integrated care intervention (n = 120) or standard care (n = 120). The intervention included preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation, psychological support, nutritional optimization, and enhanced postoperative recovery protocols. The primary outcome was postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), pain scores, functional recovery (6-min walk distance), psychological status (HADS), and quality of life (QLQ-C30). Intention-to-treat analysis was performed as the primary analysis. RESULTS: In the ITT analysis, the intervention group had significantly shorter LOS compared to control (7.43 ± 1.94 vs. 9.02 ± 2.30 days; mean difference 1.59 days, 95% CI: 1.07-2.12; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.75). After adjusting for baseline FEV1 imbalance, the difference remained significant (adjusted mean difference 1.54 days, 95% CI: 1.02-2.06; p < 0.001). PPCs were significantly lower in the intervention group (12.0% vs. 26.1%; RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.81; p = 0.008). The intervention group demonstrated superior functional recovery, with 6-min walk distance differences of 57.77 m at 1 month and 61.97 m at 3 months, both exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 22-42 m. Psychological outcomes (HADS-anxiety: 4.19 ± 2.55 vs. 6.48 ± 3.22; HADS-Depression: 3.57 ± 1.97 vs. 5.19 ± 2.89 at 3 months; both p < 0.001) and quality of life were significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: An interdisciplinary integrated care model significantly reduces hospital stay, decreases pulmonary complications, and improves functional and psychological outcomes in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. These findings support the implementation of comprehensive perioperative care programs.

ANZ Journal of Surgery
Zhujiang Hospital (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.