Development and external validation of a preoperative prediction model for in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events after hip fracture surgery in older adults: a retrospective two-center study

Older adults with hip fracture are vulnerable to postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization. However, early risk stratification remains difficult because existing assessments may require complex or late-available information. A simple model based on variables routinely available before surgery may support perioperative decision-making. We conducted a retrospective two-center cohort study of patients ≥ 60 years who underwent surgery for traumatic hip fracture at 2 hospitals in China. The development cohort included 935 patients treated between January 2024 and December 2025, and the external validation cohort included 168 patients treated between January 2020 and December 2025. Candidate preoperative predictors were screened using penalized regression. Six candidate prediction models were developed and compared using the same preprocessing pipeline. The final model was calibrated using Platt scaling. Model performance was assessed in an internal test set and an external validation cohort. In the development cohort, 122 of 935 patients developed postoperative in-hospital MACE. The final model was a Platt-calibrated logistic regression model including age, baseline electrocardiographic abnormality, chronic heart failure, serum potassium, albumin, and hemoglobin. In the internal test set, the model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.814, with a 95% CI of 0.748–0.876, and a Brier score of 0.102. At the prespecified threshold of 0.147, sensitivity was 0.710 and specificity was 0.754. In the external validation cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.760, with a 95% CI of 0.657–0.849. The Brier score was 0.141, sensitivity was 0.788, specificity was 0.630, and negative predictive value was 0.924. A simple preoperative logistic regression model based on routinely available clinical variables showed moderate discrimination in internal testing and provided preliminary external validation evidence for predicting postoperative in-hospital MACE after hip fracture surgery in older adults. The model may support early perioperative risk stratification and postoperative surveillance, although prospective multicenter validation and recalibration are needed before wider clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-07981-y
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and external validation of a preoperative prediction model for in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events after hip fracture surgery in older adults: a retrospective two-center study

Tianqiang Sheng, Shuotao Zhong, Chaojin Chen, Du Jieqiang et al.
BMC Geriatrics
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Development and external validation of a preoperative prediction model for in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events after hip fracture surgery in older adults: a retrospective two-center study

Tianqiang Sheng, Shuotao Zhong, Chaojin Chen, Du Jieqiang, Jie Yang, Yuzi You, Siyang Zeng, Ruimin Luo
article en

Abstract

Older adults with hip fracture are vulnerable to postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization. However, early risk stratification remains difficult because existing assessments may require complex or late-available information. A simple model based on variables routinely available before surgery may support perioperative decision-making. We conducted a retrospective two-center cohort study of patients ≥ 60 years who underwent surgery for traumatic hip fracture at 2 hospitals in China. The development cohort included 935 patients treated between January 2024 and December 2025, and the external validation cohort included 168 patients treated between January 2020 and December 2025. Candidate preoperative predictors were screened using penalized regression. Six candidate prediction models were developed and compared using the same preprocessing pipeline. The final model was calibrated using Platt scaling. Model performance was assessed in an internal test set and an external validation cohort. In the development cohort, 122 of 935 patients developed postoperative in-hospital MACE. The final model was a Platt-calibrated logistic regression model including age, baseline electrocardiographic abnormality, chronic heart failure, serum potassium, albumin, and hemoglobin. In the internal test set, the model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.814, with a 95% CI of 0.748–0.876, and a Brier score of 0.102. At the prespecified threshold of 0.147, sensitivity was 0.710 and specificity was 0.754. In the external validation cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.760, with a 95% CI of 0.657–0.849. The Brier score was 0.141, sensitivity was 0.788, specificity was 0.630, and negative predictive value was 0.924. A simple preoperative logistic regression model based on routinely available clinical variables showed moderate discrimination in internal testing and provided preliminary external validation evidence for predicting postoperative in-hospital MACE after hip fracture surgery in older adults. The model may support early perioperative risk stratification and postoperative surveillance, although prospective multicenter validation and recalibration are needed before wider clinical use.

BMC Geriatrics
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Foshan Hospital of TCM (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.