Personalized Treatment Recommendation System in Head and Neck Cancer Using Survival Analysis and Deep Learning

Background/Objectives: Individualized treatment selection for head and neck cancer requires survival models that use routine clinical variables while accounting for censored time-to-event outcomes. This study developed an interpretable Cox proportional hazards baseline and a DeepSurv framework to estimate mortality risk and explore treatment-specific predictions among radiotherapy-based options. Methods: Clinical data were obtained from the RADCURE collection in The Cancer Imaging Archive. After preprocessing, stage harmonization, exclusion of sparse treatment categories, missing-data assessment, one-hot encoding, and standardization, 3266 patients were analyzed. Cox regression and DeepSurv were evaluated using a held-out 80%/20% split, paired bootstrap confidence intervals for C-index differences, and five-fold cross-validation. For treatment recommendation, treatment modality was hypothetically varied across radiotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy, and radiotherapy plus epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor while other covariates were held fixed. Results: On the held-out test set, Cox achieved a C-index of 0.684 and DeepSurv achieved a C-index of 0.695. The absolute difference was 0.011, with a paired bootstrap 95% CI of −0.010 to 0.030, indicating no statistically significant improvement. Five-fold cross-validation showed mean C-index values of 0.688 for Cox and 0.707 for DeepSurv. Cox regression identified older age and advanced tumor stage as higher-risk factors, whereas former and non-smoking status were associated with lower hazard than current smoking. Conclusions: DeepSurv provided only a modest numerical gain over the Cox baseline. The recommendation framework illustrates how survival models can generate treatment-specific risk estimates, but these outputs should be interpreted as decision-support signals rather than causal treatment effects. External validation and prospective evaluation are needed before clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14152275
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalized Treatment Recommendation System in Head and Neck Cancer Using Survival Analysis and Deep Learning

N. Balakrishnan, Kai Liu, Xijing Fei
Healthcare
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Personalized Treatment Recommendation System in Head and Neck Cancer Using Survival Analysis and Deep Learning

N. Balakrishnan, Kai Liu, Xijing Fei
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Individualized treatment selection for head and neck cancer requires survival models that use routine clinical variables while accounting for censored time-to-event outcomes. This study developed an interpretable Cox proportional hazards baseline and a DeepSurv framework to estimate mortality risk and explore treatment-specific predictions among radiotherapy-based options. Methods: Clinical data were obtained from the RADCURE collection in The Cancer Imaging Archive. After preprocessing, stage harmonization, exclusion of sparse treatment categories, missing-data assessment, one-hot encoding, and standardization, 3266 patients were analyzed. Cox regression and DeepSurv were evaluated using a held-out 80%/20% split, paired bootstrap confidence intervals for C-index differences, and five-fold cross-validation. For treatment recommendation, treatment modality was hypothetically varied across radiotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy, and radiotherapy plus epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor while other covariates were held fixed. Results: On the held-out test set, Cox achieved a C-index of 0.684 and DeepSurv achieved a C-index of 0.695. The absolute difference was 0.011, with a paired bootstrap 95% CI of −0.010 to 0.030, indicating no statistically significant improvement. Five-fold cross-validation showed mean C-index values of 0.688 for Cox and 0.707 for DeepSurv. Cox regression identified older age and advanced tumor stage as higher-risk factors, whereas former and non-smoking status were associated with lower hazard than current smoking. Conclusions: DeepSurv provided only a modest numerical gain over the Cox baseline. The recommendation framework illustrates how survival models can generate treatment-specific risk estimates, but these outputs should be interpreted as decision-support signals rather than causal treatment effects. External validation and prospective evaluation are needed before clinical use.

HealthcareVol. 14(15)
Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance (CN), Atilim University (TR), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN), McMaster University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.