Surface‐Guided Radiotherapy for Vulvar Cancer in the Frog‐Leg Position: Setup Accuracy and BMI Effects

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for vulvar carcinoma often employs the "frog-leg" position to minimize skin toxicity, but this position is biomechanically unstable and prone to setup errors using conventional skin markings. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Surface-Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) for setup accuracy in vulvar cancer patients treated in the frog-leg position and to quantify the biomechanical correlation between Body Mass Index (BMI) and setup errors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 20 vulvar cancer patients treated in the frog-leg position was conducted. All patients were treated using a uRT-linac 506c accelerator with integrated helical Fan-Beam CT (FBCT). Daily image guidance was performed using a two-step registration protocol (bony anatomy followed by soft-tissue fine-tuning). Setup errors from 500 FBCT datasets were compared between the conventional laser group (n = 10) and SGRT group (n = 10). The correlation between BMI and setup errors was analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: The SGRT group demonstrated significantly superior setup accuracy across multiple key dimensions (p < 0.001). Notably, the Pitch error was reduced from 1.21° ± 0.48° in the Conventional Group to 0.07° ± 0.32° in the SGRT Group (Cohen's d = 2.79). Longitudinal (LNG) error decreased from 0.49 ± 0.26 cm to 0.04 ± 0.24 cm (d = 1.82), and vertical (VRT) errors were similarly reduced. BMI CORRELATION: In the Conventional Group, BMI showed a strong significant correlation with Pitch and Yaw errors (ρ = -0.81, P = 0.005), indicating that obesity may exacerbate pelvic rotational instability. Conversely, in the SGRT Group, no statistically significant correlation was observed between BMI and setup errors in any dimension (p > 0.05), demonstrating the system's robustness against body habitus variations. CONCLUSION: The frog-leg position is characterized by significant biomechanical instability due to distinct anatomical factors. Traditional skin marking methods are susceptible to the "skin traction effect" and interference from BMI. SGRT, through real-time topographical matching, effectively corrects pelvic tilt and longitudinal sliding. Crucially, it eliminates the setup uncertainty associated with BMI, providing a solid evidence-based foundation for precision radiotherapy and individualized PTV margin reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70714
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surface‐Guided Radiotherapy for Vulvar Cancer in the Frog‐Leg Position: Setup Accuracy and BMI Effects

Li Hongming, Yue Wang, Jingyu Lin, Hao Liang et al.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Surface‐Guided Radiotherapy for Vulvar Cancer in the Frog‐Leg Position: Setup Accuracy and BMI Effects

Li Hongming, Yue Wang, Jingyu Lin, Hao Liang, Yongguang Liang, Huiying Qu, Junfang Yan, Xiansong Sun
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for vulvar carcinoma often employs the "frog-leg" position to minimize skin toxicity, but this position is biomechanically unstable and prone to setup errors using conventional skin markings. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Surface-Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) for setup accuracy in vulvar cancer patients treated in the frog-leg position and to quantify the biomechanical correlation between Body Mass Index (BMI) and setup errors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 20 vulvar cancer patients treated in the frog-leg position was conducted. All patients were treated using a uRT-linac 506c accelerator with integrated helical Fan-Beam CT (FBCT). Daily image guidance was performed using a two-step registration protocol (bony anatomy followed by soft-tissue fine-tuning). Setup errors from 500 FBCT datasets were compared between the conventional laser group (n = 10) and SGRT group (n = 10). The correlation between BMI and setup errors was analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: The SGRT group demonstrated significantly superior setup accuracy across multiple key dimensions (p < 0.001). Notably, the Pitch error was reduced from 1.21° ± 0.48° in the Conventional Group to 0.07° ± 0.32° in the SGRT Group (Cohen's d = 2.79). Longitudinal (LNG) error decreased from 0.49 ± 0.26 cm to 0.04 ± 0.24 cm (d = 1.82), and vertical (VRT) errors were similarly reduced. BMI CORRELATION: In the Conventional Group, BMI showed a strong significant correlation with Pitch and Yaw errors (ρ = -0.81, P = 0.005), indicating that obesity may exacerbate pelvic rotational instability. Conversely, in the SGRT Group, no statistically significant correlation was observed between BMI and setup errors in any dimension (p > 0.05), demonstrating the system's robustness against body habitus variations. CONCLUSION: The frog-leg position is characterized by significant biomechanical instability due to distinct anatomical factors. Traditional skin marking methods are susceptible to the "skin traction effect" and interference from BMI. SGRT, through real-time topographical matching, effectively corrects pelvic tilt and longitudinal sliding. Crucially, it eliminates the setup uncertainty associated with BMI, providing a solid evidence-based foundation for precision radiotherapy and individualized PTV margin reduction.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical PhysicsVol. 27(8)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.