Actionable Incidental Findings at Baseline Lung Cancer Screening: Identifying Opportunities in a Universal Healthcare System

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of actionable incidental findings (AIFs) in a high-risk lung cancer screening cohort within a universal healthcare setting and identify potential opportunities in system-level quality improvement for AIF detection and management. Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified all individuals that presented for a baseline lung cancer screening exam between August 2019 and September 2025. Structured computed tomography (CT) report text was extracted and included an affirmation of whether an AIF was present, a description of the AIF, and a management recommendation. AIF type and prevalence were compared to guideline literature to identify areas of lower-than-expected reporting. Comparisons were performed using t -tests or chi-square tests. Results: There were 3169 unique individuals with eligible CT reports (37.2% female, 64.0 ± 5.2 years of age) with 424 AIFs identified in 370 (11.7%) individuals. AIFs were associated with higher body mass index, active smoking, Lung-RADS score, and less common with a personal history of cancer ( P < .05). Moderate or severe coronary artery calcification (n = 106, 3.3%), thyroid lesions (n = 43, 1.4%), and interstitial lung abnormalities (n = 41, 1.3%) were most common. Bone mineral density (0%), vertebral fractures (0.1%), and indeterminate adrenal lesions (0.1%) were infrequently reported despite guidelines suggesting clinical relevance. Management recommendations were generally aligned with provincial program-specific guidance. Conclusion: AIFs were common, but prevalence was relatively low for several key, potentially significant findings. Standardized reporting of AIFs and program-specific guidance is required considering the downstream costs associated with systematic identification of these AIFs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371261467271
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Actionable Incidental Findings at Baseline Lung Cancer Screening: Identifying Opportunities in a Universal Healthcare System

Micheal Chad McInnis, Hussain AlShimali, Adam Gaisinsky, F. Castillo et al.
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Actionable Incidental Findings at Baseline Lung Cancer Screening: Identifying Opportunities in a Universal Healthcare System

Micheal Chad McInnis, Hussain AlShimali, Adam Gaisinsky, F. Castillo, Alina Blazer, Lara Gabrielle Lim
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of actionable incidental findings (AIFs) in a high-risk lung cancer screening cohort within a universal healthcare setting and identify potential opportunities in system-level quality improvement for AIF detection and management. Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified all individuals that presented for a baseline lung cancer screening exam between August 2019 and September 2025. Structured computed tomography (CT) report text was extracted and included an affirmation of whether an AIF was present, a description of the AIF, and a management recommendation. AIF type and prevalence were compared to guideline literature to identify areas of lower-than-expected reporting. Comparisons were performed using t -tests or chi-square tests. Results: There were 3169 unique individuals with eligible CT reports (37.2% female, 64.0 ± 5.2 years of age) with 424 AIFs identified in 370 (11.7%) individuals. AIFs were associated with higher body mass index, active smoking, Lung-RADS score, and less common with a personal history of cancer ( P < .05). Moderate or severe coronary artery calcification (n = 106, 3.3%), thyroid lesions (n = 43, 1.4%), and interstitial lung abnormalities (n = 41, 1.3%) were most common. Bone mineral density (0%), vertebral fractures (0.1%), and indeterminate adrenal lesions (0.1%) were infrequently reported despite guidelines suggesting clinical relevance. Management recommendations were generally aligned with provincial program-specific guidance. Conclusion: AIFs were common, but prevalence was relatively low for several key, potentially significant findings. Standardized reporting of AIFs and program-specific guidance is required considering the downstream costs associated with systematic identification of these AIFs.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
University Health Network (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Imaging Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.