Response classification changes the apparent predictive value of Par-6 family cell polarity regulator gamma for programmed cell death protein 1 blockade.

Xu et al. reported that Par-6 family cell polarity regulator gamma discriminated between response groups after programmed cell death protein 1 blockade, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.823. The source study classified the same 28 patients as nine responders and nineteen nonresponders. Xu et al. instead analyzed sixteen and twelve after including seven minimal responders in the responder group. We reanalyzed pretreatment expression using the target, source, exclusion and ordinal definitions. The area under the curve was 0.807 under the target definition and 0.602 under the source definition, a paired difference of 0.205 (95% confidence interval, 0.008-0.415); excluding minimal responders yielded 0.750. An alternative normalization method produced the same contrast. These findings do not diminish the biological relevance of the marker, but show that its discrimination is classification-sensitive in this public cohort. Prespecified response coding and patient-level resampling of the complete feature-selection pipeline are needed before the marker is advanced as treatment-predictive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2026.117168
Primary Topic
Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response classification changes the apparent predictive value of Par-6 family cell polarity regulator gamma for programmed cell death protein 1 blockade.

Quanhui Chen
PubMed
Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
article

Response classification changes the apparent predictive value of Par-6 family cell polarity regulator gamma for programmed cell death protein 1 blockade.

Quanhui Chen
article en

Abstract

Xu et al. reported that Par-6 family cell polarity regulator gamma discriminated between response groups after programmed cell death protein 1 blockade, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.823. The source study classified the same 28 patients as nine responders and nineteen nonresponders. Xu et al. instead analyzed sixteen and twelve after including seven minimal responders in the responder group. We reanalyzed pretreatment expression using the target, source, exclusion and ordinal definitions. The area under the curve was 0.807 under the target definition and 0.602 under the source definition, a paired difference of 0.205 (95% confidence interval, 0.008-0.415); excluding minimal responders yielded 0.750. An alternative normalization method produced the same contrast. These findings do not diminish the biological relevance of the marker, but show that its discrimination is classification-sensitive in this public cohort. Prespecified response coding and patient-level resampling of the complete feature-selection pipeline are needed before the marker is advanced as treatment-predictive.

PubMedVol. 187
Longyan University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Response classification changes the apparent predictive value of Par-6 family cell polarity regulator gamma for programmed cell death protein 1 blockade. — Quanhui Chen · PubMed (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS