Building trust in a suspicious network: findings from a one-year digital ethnography of five online sperm donation platforms

Online sperm donation (OSD) connects prospective parents ('recipients') with donors via digital platforms. While prior research has focused on motivations and experiences, little attention has been given to the norms, identities, and relational dynamics shaping interactions on OSD platforms. Drawing on a year-long digital ethnography of five OSD platforms, this paper reports on a thematic analysis of multi-modal data that show that mistrust was pervasive. Users engaged in ongoing surveillance and scrutiny to 'stay safe' and protect others and future donor-conceived children. Norms about who was 'safe' or a 'good' donor or recipient influenced self-presentation and selection. Experienced donors were often constructed as knowledgeable, legitimising their authority to define what was 'normal'. Platform architectures, including user-driven safety features and gamification, shaped interactions, sometimes paradoxically contributing to harm rather than preventing it. These findings are situated within broader literature on digital sharing economies and connection platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Fertility
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2026.2707214
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building trust in a suspicious network: findings from a one-year digital ethnography of five online sperm donation platforms

Allan Pacey, Lauren A. Smith, Lucy Eldred, Georgina Jones et al.
Human Fertility
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Building trust in a suspicious network: findings from a one-year digital ethnography of five online sperm donation platforms

Allan Pacey, Lauren A. Smith, Lucy Eldred, Georgina Jones, Lucy Frith, Aleks Krotoski, David Carless, Rhys Turner‐Moore, T Vail Palmer, Francesca Taylor
article en

Abstract

Online sperm donation (OSD) connects prospective parents ('recipients') with donors via digital platforms. While prior research has focused on motivations and experiences, little attention has been given to the norms, identities, and relational dynamics shaping interactions on OSD platforms. Drawing on a year-long digital ethnography of five OSD platforms, this paper reports on a thematic analysis of multi-modal data that show that mistrust was pervasive. Users engaged in ongoing surveillance and scrutiny to 'stay safe' and protect others and future donor-conceived children. Norms about who was 'safe' or a 'good' donor or recipient influenced self-presentation and selection. Experienced donors were often constructed as knowledgeable, legitimising their authority to define what was 'normal'. Platform architectures, including user-driven safety features and gamification, shaped interactions, sometimes paradoxically contributing to harm rather than preventing it. These findings are situated within broader literature on digital sharing economies and connection platforms.

Human FertilityVol. 29(1)
University of Sussex (GB), Ethics and Public Policy Center (US), University of Manchester (GB), Zillow Group (United States) (US), Leeds Beckett University (GB), University of the West of Scotland (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.