Clustering of Cerebral Microbleeds in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Flow Territory‐Based Analysis

ABSTRACT Background Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are a key imaging marker of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), but their individual spatial distribution and potential clustering remain poorly understood. Purpose This study assessed whether CMBs exhibit patient‐specific, flow territory‐based clustering in sporadic (sCAA) and Dutch‐type hereditary CAA (D‐CAA). The arterial flow territory subdivision was chosen, considering the predilection of CMB location in the posterior cortex—not limited to the occipital lobe—and the prominent vascular role in CAA. Study Type Retrospective cross‐sectional study. Population Thirty‐three participants (17 (52%) female, 65 ± 12 years old, 19 sCAA; 14 D‐CAA) without symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and ≥ 1 CMB were included for the main analysis. Field Strength/Sequence 3 T MRI susceptibility‐weighted imaging, multi‐echo 3D gradient echo. Assessment Spatial CMB patterns were evaluated by comparing observed versus expected CMB density within covariate‐matched subgroups, accounting for age, sex, CAA‐type, smoking, and hypertension. CMBs were manually annotated and assigned to six arterial flow territories (left/right ACA, MCA, PCA) using a standardized atlas. A sensitivity analysis was performed on all participants (including sICH+ participants). Statistical Tests Expected values were calculated by multiplying flow territory CMB proportions per covariate‐matched subgroup. Unweighted individual chi‐square statistics were calculated, and statistical significance was assessed via permutation testing (10,000 replications) per covariate group. Results Across covariate‐matched subgroups, observed CMB counts significantly deviated from expected distributions, indicating substantial interindividual variability and within‐participant clustering ( χ 2 = 6920). The effect remained significant when including sICH+ participants ( χ 2 = 102,027, n = 85; 44 sCAA; 41 D‐CAA). CMB densities differed across flow territories, with highest median densities in the right PCA, right MCA, and left PCA (0.173 (IQR = 0.387), 0.121 (IQR = 0.238), and 0.113 (IQR = 0.389) counts per cm 3 , respectively). Data Conclusion These findings indicate CMBs in CAA are not identically distributed but show patient‐specific clustering within flow territories, suggesting variable regional vulnerability, potentially influenced by local pathology or vascular anatomy. Evidence Level 1. Technical Efficacy Stage 2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70454
Primary Topic
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clustering of Cerebral Microbleeds in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Flow Territory‐Based Analysis

M. Schipper, Emma A. Koemans, Jelle J. Goeman, Thijs W. van Harten et al.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
article

Clustering of Cerebral Microbleeds in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Flow Territory‐Based Analysis

M. Schipper, Emma A. Koemans, Jelle J. Goeman, Thijs W. van Harten, Matthias J.P. van Osch, Marianne A.A. van Walderveen, Reinier G.J. van der Zwet, Marieke J. H. Wermer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are a key imaging marker of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), but their individual spatial distribution and potential clustering remain poorly understood. Purpose This study assessed whether CMBs exhibit patient‐specific, flow territory‐based clustering in sporadic (sCAA) and Dutch‐type hereditary CAA (D‐CAA). The arterial flow territory subdivision was chosen, considering the predilection of CMB location in the posterior cortex—not limited to the occipital lobe—and the prominent vascular role in CAA. Study Type Retrospective cross‐sectional study. Population Thirty‐three participants (17 (52%) female, 65 ± 12 years old, 19 sCAA; 14 D‐CAA) without symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and ≥ 1 CMB were included for the main analysis. Field Strength/Sequence 3 T MRI susceptibility‐weighted imaging, multi‐echo 3D gradient echo. Assessment Spatial CMB patterns were evaluated by comparing observed versus expected CMB density within covariate‐matched subgroups, accounting for age, sex, CAA‐type, smoking, and hypertension. CMBs were manually annotated and assigned to six arterial flow territories (left/right ACA, MCA, PCA) using a standardized atlas. A sensitivity analysis was performed on all participants (including sICH+ participants). Statistical Tests Expected values were calculated by multiplying flow territory CMB proportions per covariate‐matched subgroup. Unweighted individual chi‐square statistics were calculated, and statistical significance was assessed via permutation testing (10,000 replications) per covariate group. Results Across covariate‐matched subgroups, observed CMB counts significantly deviated from expected distributions, indicating substantial interindividual variability and within‐participant clustering ( χ 2 = 6920). The effect remained significant when including sICH+ participants ( χ 2 = 102,027, n = 85; 44 sCAA; 41 D‐CAA). CMB densities differed across flow territories, with highest median densities in the right PCA, right MCA, and left PCA (0.173 (IQR = 0.387), 0.121 (IQR = 0.238), and 0.113 (IQR = 0.389) counts per cm 3 , respectively). Data Conclusion These findings indicate CMBs in CAA are not identically distributed but show patient‐specific clustering within flow territories, suggesting variable regional vulnerability, potentially influenced by local pathology or vascular anatomy. Evidence Level 1. Technical Efficacy Stage 2.

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Harvard University (US), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.