Understanding public perspectives on direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing in the UK: a qualitative study

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is expanding rapidly in the UK, yet no dedicated regulatory framework currently governs these services. Although a 2021 parliamentary inquiry recommended stronger safeguards and clearer technical standards for genomic testing, these proposals have not been applied to PGx. This study explores public attitudes toward DTC PGx testing, focusing on expectations for pre-test information, quality standards, and NHS data use. We conducted focus groups with members of the public, both with and without prior experience of purchasing DTC PGx tests, or other online health tests. Focus groups were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and analysed thematically. We identified three themes: (mis)understanding towards and awareness of DTC PGx testing; altruistic motivation and equity concerns; and (mis)trust. Participants were generally enthusiastic about PGx testing, as long as issues of equity, data protection, and regulation were addressed, with data sharing concerns being particularly prominent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-026-00425-1
Primary Topic
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding public perspectives on direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing in the UK: a qualitative study

A. McL Mathieson, John McDermott, Stephanie Gillibrand, Lisa Brunton et al.
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
article

Understanding public perspectives on direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing in the UK: a qualitative study

A. McL Mathieson, John McDermott, Stephanie Gillibrand, Lisa Brunton, Ramona Moldovan
article en

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is expanding rapidly in the UK, yet no dedicated regulatory framework currently governs these services. Although a 2021 parliamentary inquiry recommended stronger safeguards and clearer technical standards for genomic testing, these proposals have not been applied to PGx. This study explores public attitudes toward DTC PGx testing, focusing on expectations for pre-test information, quality standards, and NHS data use. We conducted focus groups with members of the public, both with and without prior experience of purchasing DTC PGx tests, or other online health tests. Focus groups were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and analysed thematically. We identified three themes: (mis)understanding towards and awareness of DTC PGx testing; altruistic motivation and equity concerns; and (mis)trust. Participants were generally enthusiastic about PGx testing, as long as issues of equity, data protection, and regulation were addressed, with data sharing concerns being particularly prominent.

The Pharmacogenomics JournalVol. 26(4)
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), St Mary's Hospital (GB), St Mary's Hospital (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.