Consumer Experiences and Perceptions of Genetic Counseling in Provider‐Mediated Genetic Testing

Provider-mediated genetic testing (PM-GT) is a hybrid model in which consumers initiate testing online, but a physician, typically from a third-party network, is required to order the test. While genetic counseling is a critical component of result interpretation and medical decision-making, its integration into PM-GT remains limited. This study explored how consumers engaged with genetic counseling in the context of PM-GT, including factors that influenced whether they pursued it and their perceptions of its value. Participants had previously undergone a 59-gene panel test for cancer and cardiovascular disease risk through Color Health, a PM-GT company. Twenty-nine participants completed qualitative interviews about their testing experience and a follow-up survey that was focused on genetic counseling. Post-test counseling was required only for individuals with positive results and was optional for those with negative or variant of uncertain significance (VUS) results. Using quantitative content analysis and qualitative inductive content analysis, we found that while most participants did not engage in pre- or post-test counseling, nearly half of those who had not yet spoken with a genetic counselor after receiving their results expressed interest in doing so in the future. Participants often viewed the counseling that was offered by the testing company as helpful for understanding their results, clarifying disease risk, and guiding medical decisions. Time constraints were the most frequently cited barrier to accessing genetic counseling services. These findings indicate a gap between consumers' interest in counseling and their actual uptake of services, suggesting that many consumers who could benefit from counseling do not receive it. More proactive integration of genetic counseling into the PM-GT process could help bridge this gap and ensure that consumers are appropriately supported regardless of their test results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70257
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer Experiences and Perceptions of Genetic Counseling in Provider‐Mediated Genetic Testing

Madison K. Kilbride, Jason Iuliano, J Y Park, Karin M. Dent et al.
Journal of Genetic Counseling
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Consumer Experiences and Perceptions of Genetic Counseling in Provider‐Mediated Genetic Testing

Madison K. Kilbride, Jason Iuliano, J Y Park, Karin M. Dent, Bob Wong, Margaret Peo, Katherine A. Lauro, Angela R. Bradbury
article en

Abstract

Provider-mediated genetic testing (PM-GT) is a hybrid model in which consumers initiate testing online, but a physician, typically from a third-party network, is required to order the test. While genetic counseling is a critical component of result interpretation and medical decision-making, its integration into PM-GT remains limited. This study explored how consumers engaged with genetic counseling in the context of PM-GT, including factors that influenced whether they pursued it and their perceptions of its value. Participants had previously undergone a 59-gene panel test for cancer and cardiovascular disease risk through Color Health, a PM-GT company. Twenty-nine participants completed qualitative interviews about their testing experience and a follow-up survey that was focused on genetic counseling. Post-test counseling was required only for individuals with positive results and was optional for those with negative or variant of uncertain significance (VUS) results. Using quantitative content analysis and qualitative inductive content analysis, we found that while most participants did not engage in pre- or post-test counseling, nearly half of those who had not yet spoken with a genetic counselor after receiving their results expressed interest in doing so in the future. Participants often viewed the counseling that was offered by the testing company as helpful for understanding their results, clarifying disease risk, and guiding medical decisions. Time constraints were the most frequently cited barrier to accessing genetic counseling services. These findings indicate a gap between consumers' interest in counseling and their actual uptake of services, suggesting that many consumers who could benefit from counseling do not receive it. More proactive integration of genetic counseling into the PM-GT process could help bridge this gap and ensure that consumers are appropriately supported regardless of their test results.

Journal of Genetic CounselingVol. 35(4)
University of Utah (US), Borchard Foundation Center on Law and Aging (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.