Reading Abilities and Visual Evoked Potentials in Hearing-Impaired Children: A Comparative Study of Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Users.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate reading comprehension skills, visual evoked potentials (VEP), and saccadic eye movements in hearing aid (HA) users, cochlear implant (CI) users, and individuals with normal hearing (NH), to investigate the relationship between sensory processing and reading ability. METHODS: The study included 45 participants, 15 HA users, 15 CI users and 15 NH. VEP, a saccadic test, and a reading comprehension test were performed. VEP recordings were conducted with and without the hearing device for HA and CI users. RESULTS: Reading comprehension scores in the CI group were significantly lower than those in the NH and HA groups (p < .001). Rightward saccade velocity was consistently lower than leftward velocity across all groups. Notably, VEP amplitudes in HA users (N1-P1: p = .048) and CI users (N1-P1: p = .005, .019, .001; P1-N2: p = .010, .008, .022) were significantly larger in the unaided condition (without device) compared to the aided condition. Correlation analyses did not reveal a consistent pattern of association between reading comprehension scores and VEP parameters. CONCLUSION: While reading skills were found to be weaker in the CI group, the absence of a direct correlation between VEP/saccadic parameters and reading scores suggests that lower-level sensory processing and higher-order reading comprehension may operate through distinct mechanisms. The increased VEP amplitudes observed without hearing devices suggest a cross-modal neuroplastic compensation in the visual cortex during auditory deprivation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/aud/abnag001
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading Abilities and Visual Evoked Potentials in Hearing-Impaired Children: A Comparative Study of Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Users.

Nurten Uzun Adatepe, Erdem Emre Yilmaz, Selma Yılar, Işık Baltacı et al.
PubMed
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Reading Abilities and Visual Evoked Potentials in Hearing-Impaired Children: A Comparative Study of Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Users.

Nurten Uzun Adatepe, Erdem Emre Yilmaz, Selma Yılar, Işık Baltacı, A E Atas
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate reading comprehension skills, visual evoked potentials (VEP), and saccadic eye movements in hearing aid (HA) users, cochlear implant (CI) users, and individuals with normal hearing (NH), to investigate the relationship between sensory processing and reading ability. METHODS: The study included 45 participants, 15 HA users, 15 CI users and 15 NH. VEP, a saccadic test, and a reading comprehension test were performed. VEP recordings were conducted with and without the hearing device for HA and CI users. RESULTS: Reading comprehension scores in the CI group were significantly lower than those in the NH and HA groups (p < .001). Rightward saccade velocity was consistently lower than leftward velocity across all groups. Notably, VEP amplitudes in HA users (N1-P1: p = .048) and CI users (N1-P1: p = .005, .019, .001; P1-N2: p = .010, .008, .022) were significantly larger in the unaided condition (without device) compared to the aided condition. Correlation analyses did not reveal a consistent pattern of association between reading comprehension scores and VEP parameters. CONCLUSION: While reading skills were found to be weaker in the CI group, the absence of a direct correlation between VEP/saccadic parameters and reading scores suggests that lower-level sensory processing and higher-order reading comprehension may operate through distinct mechanisms. The increased VEP amplitudes observed without hearing devices suggest a cross-modal neuroplastic compensation in the visual cortex during auditory deprivation.

PubMed
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.