Lost to Follow‐Up in Pragmatic Trials With Remote Follow‐Up: Insights From CONNECT‐HF and TRANSFORM‐HF

BACKGROUND: Pragmatic trials commonly use remote follow-up to reduce participant burden and costs. However, these approaches may increase the risk of lost to follow-up (LTFU). We identified patient- and site-level factors associated with LTFU in 2 large, pragmatic heart failure (HF) trials. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2 pragmatic US trials (CONNECT-HF [Care Optimization Through Patient and Hospital Engagement Clinical Trial for Heart Failure], TRANSFORM-HF [Torsemide Comparison With Furosemide for Management of Heart Failure]) following HF hospitalization. Both trials employed centralized call center-based follow-up with supplemental data sources. For this analysis, LTFU was defined as the absence of both a completed 6-month assessment and any subsequent clinical follow-up throughout the study (confirmation of vital status alone was insufficient). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with LTFU in each trial. RESULTS: The LTFU rates were 7.6% (362/4771) in CONNECT-HF and 10.5% (245/2334) in TRANSFORM-HF. In multivariable analyses of both trials, younger age was consistently associated with increased LTFU. Conversely, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy was consistently associated with lower LTFU (CONNECT-HF: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.43-0.75]; TRANSFORM-HF: aOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39-0.89]). In CONNECT-HF, smaller hospital size (aOR per 100 beds, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.83-0.97]) was also associated with higher LTFU. Socioeconomic factors were not significantly associated with LTFU. CONCLUSIONS: In analyses of 2 pragmatic trials of patients hospitalized for HF in the United States, younger patients, those without implantable cardioverter-defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy, and smaller hospital size were associated with higher LTFU. Tailoring retention strategies to both patient and site characteristics should be explored in future work to help mitigate LTFU in pragmatic trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.046455
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost to Follow‐Up in Pragmatic Trials With Remote Follow‐Up: Insights From CONNECT‐HF and TRANSFORM‐HF

Haolin Xu, Joseph B Lerman, Stephen John Greene, Manasi Tannu et al.
Journal of the American Heart Association
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Lost to Follow‐Up in Pragmatic Trials With Remote Follow‐Up: Insights From CONNECT‐HF and TRANSFORM‐HF

Haolin Xu, Joseph B Lerman, Stephen John Greene, Manasi Tannu, Adrian F. Hernandez, Christopher Bull Granger, Lisa A. Kaltenbach, Javed Butler, Eric J. Velazquez, Satoshi Shoji, Min Soo Cho, Robert John Mentz, Gregg C. Fonarow, Veraprapas Kittipibul, Bradi B. Granger, Kevin J. Anstrom, Adam D. DeVore, Amanda Harrington
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pragmatic trials commonly use remote follow-up to reduce participant burden and costs. However, these approaches may increase the risk of lost to follow-up (LTFU). We identified patient- and site-level factors associated with LTFU in 2 large, pragmatic heart failure (HF) trials. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2 pragmatic US trials (CONNECT-HF [Care Optimization Through Patient and Hospital Engagement Clinical Trial for Heart Failure], TRANSFORM-HF [Torsemide Comparison With Furosemide for Management of Heart Failure]) following HF hospitalization. Both trials employed centralized call center-based follow-up with supplemental data sources. For this analysis, LTFU was defined as the absence of both a completed 6-month assessment and any subsequent clinical follow-up throughout the study (confirmation of vital status alone was insufficient). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with LTFU in each trial. RESULTS: The LTFU rates were 7.6% (362/4771) in CONNECT-HF and 10.5% (245/2334) in TRANSFORM-HF. In multivariable analyses of both trials, younger age was consistently associated with increased LTFU. Conversely, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy was consistently associated with lower LTFU (CONNECT-HF: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.43-0.75]; TRANSFORM-HF: aOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39-0.89]). In CONNECT-HF, smaller hospital size (aOR per 100 beds, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.83-0.97]) was also associated with higher LTFU. Socioeconomic factors were not significantly associated with LTFU. CONCLUSIONS: In analyses of 2 pragmatic trials of patients hospitalized for HF in the United States, younger patients, those without implantable cardioverter-defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy, and smaller hospital size were associated with higher LTFU. Tailoring retention strategies to both patient and site characteristics should be explored in future work to help mitigate LTFU in pragmatic trials.

Journal of the American Heart Association
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Ulsan College (KR), Duke University (US), Keio University (JP), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), Yale University (US), University of Ulsan (KR), Clinical Research Institute (US), Baylor Medical Center at Garland (US), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.